· Public charity
Group Health Inc
Our mission is to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $212,774 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $319,286 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $106,512 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEYSTONE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $60,000 |
| INTERFAITH ACTION OF GREATER ST PAUL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ST PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY | $20,000 |
| PENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY | $15,000 |
| TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $12,000 |
| WOMENS HEALTH LEADERSHIP TRUST | $10,000 |
| RENEWING THE COUNTRYSIDE | $10,000 |
| CAN DO CANINES | $7,887 |
| THE FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC | $7,887 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $363k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PNPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $694k · revenue +26%
- PHPORTICO HEALTHNET2× · 2018–2021 · $150k · revenue +10%
- HIHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE2× · 2018–2019 · $119k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- RIRAMSEY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $960k · revenue -98%
- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR ART & HEALING INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +410%
- WCWRIGHT COUNTYone grant, 2021 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Our mission is to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…
The minnesota community health worker alliance builds community and systems capacity for better health through the integration of community health worker (chw) strategies. our vision is equitable and optimal outcomes for all communities.…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Provide quality, accessible, and valuable health care services via a hospital, home health agency, and clinic to the surrounding rural community.
Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o
Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality health care which meets the needs of all people. our vision is to be the patient-centered hospital of choice of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way and the most unlike its peers is African Coalition Workforce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAMSEY INTEGRATED HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAKEVIEW HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH ↗
- Who funds PORTICO HEALTHNET ↗
- Who funds HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WESTFIELDS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUDSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE SAINT PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds HUTCHINSON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis ↗
- Who funds RENEWING THE COUNTRYSIDE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SHARES OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds AMERY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Keystone Community Services ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds PENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH ACTION OF GREATER SAINT PAUL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR ART & HEALING INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA DENTAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds OLIVIA HOSPITAL & CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NAMI MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds AMERY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVEN FIFTEEN CLUB - WOMEN IN HEALTH CARE LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR BETTER HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Ucare Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Pohlad Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Ucare Minnesota · Medica Foundation · Allina Health System · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Minnesota Historical Society · The McKnight Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Group Health Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.