Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gross Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$208kEnvironment$148kRecreation & Sports$91kHuman Services$78kFood & Nutrition$45kEducation$30kInternational$14kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$908k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
B'NAI VAIL CONGREGATION$40,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$10,000
VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND$10,000
NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM INC$10,000
MOUNTAIN RECREATION FOUNDATION$4,000
SAINT ALBERT CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$4,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - CHABAD VAIL$3,600
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$3,000
CUES FUND$2,000
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $37k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $20k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $10k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
SD
IA
CO
NE
VA
KS
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$587k · 22 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
6

Total granted

$587k
$18k

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM HANNA PINNEO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +24%
  • VV
    Vail Valley Charitable Fund Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $69k · revenue +71%
  • BF
    Betty Ford Alpine Gardens
    8× · 2017–2024 · $56k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • LG
    LAURITZEN GARDENS
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • EE
    EVRF - EAGLE VALLEY RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
2
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
3
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
6
The Access Fund

The mission of the access fund is to lead and inspire the climbing community toward sustainable access and conservation of the climbing environment.

Unclassified
7
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
8
Mountain Area Land Trust

Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.

Environment
9
Colo Foundation for Water Education

Water education colorado ensures coloradans are informed on water issues and equipped to make decisions that guide our state to a sustainable water future.

Environment
10
Western Sustainability Exchange

Advancing sustainability in the western area of the united states through a series of programs and activities designed to promote better ranching practices. a strong focus is to provide ranchers with the information, tools, technical…

Environment
11
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
12
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation, chartered by congress, engages americans in community-based and national programs that promote the health and public enjoyment of the 193-million acre national forest system, and accepts and administers…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BNAI VAIL CONGREGATION INC: $115,900 · OtherBNAI VAIL CONGREGATION INCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - CHABAD VAIL: $91,800 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER - CHABAD VAILCOLORADO SNOWSPORTS MUSEUM: $60,000 · OtherCOLORADO SNOWSPORTS MUSEUMLAURITZEN GARDENS: $14,000 · Other+18 more: $49,950 · Other+18 moreNEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM HANNA PINNEO: $87,000 · EnvironmentNEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORE…Betty Ford Alpine Gardens: $56,250 · EnvironmentBetty Ford Alpine Gardens+1 more: $1,400 · EnvironmentVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc: $69,000 · Human ServicesVail Valley …+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $44,500 · Food & NutritionMountain Recreation Foundation: $14,000 · Recreation & SportsENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 · InternationalHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $6,700 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 · Education
Other$331,650Environment$144,650Human Services$70,000Food & Nutrition$44,500Recreation & Sports$17,000International$13,500Education$9,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM HANNA PINNEO: $87,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc: $69,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetBetty Ford Alpine Gardens: $56,250 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $44,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Recreation Foundation: $14,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $6,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCUES FUND: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc: $2,900 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS WORKSHOP: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM HANNA PINNEO ↗
  • Who funds Vail Valley Charitable Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Betty Ford Alpine Gardens ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Recreation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CUES FUND ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Mountain Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS WORKSHOP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose Community FoundationCO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gross Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gross Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gross Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gross Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gross Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph