Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grimes Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$521kReligion$208kHuman Services$130kRecreation & Sports$32kAnimals$21kPhilanthropy$15kYouth Development$11kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Plymouth Place$80,000
St Francis Xavier Catholic Parish$32,500
Sts Peter & Paul School$32,000
Benet Academy$11,300
Ohio State University Gymnastics Program$10,000
Nicholas D Sergi Foundation$7,500
Fluffs & Scruffs A Dog Rescue$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Drive Fore the Future Foundation$4,000
Ohio State University Track & Field Program$2,500
St John of the Cross Parish$1,050
Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance$1,000
Mercyhurst University$750
Muscular Dystrophy Association$700
St Francis Xavier Parish Music Ministry$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Yorkshire Terrier National Rescue: $750 → 9%Yorkshire Terrier National Rescue: $750 → 9%The Voices & Faces Project: $20k → 14%Yorkshire Terrier Rescue: $750 → 9%Yorkshire Terrier National Rescue: $750 → 9%Yorkshire Terrier Rescue: $500 → 9%Plymouth Place: $80k → 14%Martha's Village & Kitchen: $500 → 11%Plymouth Place: $25k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTION: $320 → 14%Aging Care Connections: $320 → 14%Aging Care Connections: $320 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$916k · 31 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$916k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+89%

Still filing today

32%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    Nicholas D Sergi Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $12k · revenue +52%
  • MU
    MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • PC
    PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SF
    St Francis Xavier School
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • TV
    THE VOICES & FACES PROJECT
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • SP
    Sts Peter and Paul Catholic Parish
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
2
Misericordia Home

The mission of misericordia home is to support children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who choose our community by providing the highest quality residential, training, and employment services. we provide the…

Human Services
3
The Village At Mercy Creek

The Mission of The Villas at Mercy Creek is to Celebrate Life and Serve with Joy.

Housing & Shelter
4
Franciscan Communities Inc

The mission of franciscan communities inc. ("franciscan communities") is to celebrate life and serve with joy. (continued on schedule o).

—
5
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
6
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
7
Alzheimer's Family Services Center

To improve the quality of life for families challenged by alzheimer's disease or another dementia, through services tailored to meet individual needs.

—
8
St Anne Home

St. anne home is a ministry of the felician sisters of north america dedicated to the continued healing mission of jesus christ by providing a continuum of care and supportive services to adults, their families, and their caregivers. st.…

Health
9
Franciscan Community Benefit Services

MISSION - TO celebrate life and serve with joy. Vision - to provide access to Catholic high schools and offer programs for higher education and career readiness for young women from the Chicago area.

Religion
10
The Chicago Home for Incurables

The primary purpose of the chicago home for incurables, ("the home"), is to provide financial support to the university of chicago for the operation of patient care facilities and funding of research of incurable diseases at the university…

Health
11
Meridian Village Association

To address and meet the needs of aged persons, including housing, healthcare, and financial security.

—
12
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nicholas D Sergi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BENET ACADEMY: $304,230 · OtherBENET ACADEMYSts Peter & Paul School: $128,000 · OtherSts Peter & Paul SchoolSt Francis Xavier Catholic Parish: $122,200 · OtherSt Francis Xavier Catholic ParishIndividual grant recipient: $40,600 · OtherST PETER AND PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherST FRANCIS XAVIER PARISH: $28,500 · OtherST FRANCIS XAVIER: $28,000 · Other+34 more: $151,480 · Other+34 morePLYMOUTH PLACE INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesPLYMOUTH PLACE…THE VOICES & FACES PROJECT: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE VOICES & F…+3 more: $4,960 · Human ServicesNicholas D Sergi Foundation: $12,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyLa Grange Country Club Foundation: $1,250 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyMERCYHURST UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · EducationPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5,750 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $700 · HealthGIVE ME A CHANCE FOUNDATION: $3,250 · Recreation & SportsVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders: $1,250 · Youth Development
Other$833,010Human Services$129,960Philanthropy$15,750Education$9,500Health$6,450Recreation & Sports$3,250Youth Development$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLYMOUTH PLACE INC: $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOICES & FACES PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNicholas D Sergi Foundation: $12,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMERCYHURST UNIVERSITY: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYORKSHIRE TERRIER NATIONAL RESCUE INC: $3,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetGIVE ME A CHANCE FOUNDATION: $3,250 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOX VALLEY OLDER ADULT SERVICES: $1,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLa Grange Country Club Foundation: $1,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $960 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDS PLUS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANNA'S CELEBRATION OF LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLYMOUTH PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VOICES & FACES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FLUFFS & SCRUFFS A DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Nicholas D Sergi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MERCYHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds YORKSHIRE TERRIER NATIONAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE ME A CHANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY OLDER ADULT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds La Grange Country Club Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Vocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders ↗
  • Who funds THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Metropolitan Chicago IncIL17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Community Memorial Foundation · Ageoptions Inc (Fka Suburban Area Agency on Aging) · Baird Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grimes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grimes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grimes Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph