Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Greiner Weiser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$455kEmployment$334kYouth Development$149kEducation$115kPhilanthropy$111kReligion$44kHousing & Shelter$32kHealth$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$468k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACK MILLER CENTER$110,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH FLORIDA$25,000
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$20,000
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$5,000
CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP$5,000
THE CHILDREN'S MOVEMENT OF FLORIDA$5,000
AND TWO FISHES$3,000
GIRLS INC$2,500
REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE$2,500
KEY BISCAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
HISTORY MIAMI MUSEUM$2,000
HARRIS HOUSE$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,025
TEMPLE BETH AM$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $5k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $2k → 15%REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE: $3k → 15%REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE: $3k → 15%REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE: $3k → 15%REFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Greiner Weiser Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 64% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 39% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Greiner Weiser Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 22 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
19

Total granted

$1.1M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+4%

Still filing today

64%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $334k · revenue +52%
  • HA
    HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $272k · revenue +10%
  • GI
    GIRLS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $138k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNICATION PROJECT CO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CO
    CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN CHRISTIAN UNION
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • DH
    DADE HERITAGE TRUST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Florida International University Health Care Network Inc

Fiu health care network's mission is to improve and support medical education at the fiu herbert wertheim college of medicine and provide clinical support services to the larger fiu community.

2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
4
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
5
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech
6
Florida International University Research Foundation Inc

The fiu research foundation provides means by which discoveries, inventions, processes, and work products of faculty, staff and students of the university may be patented, developed, applied and utilized in order that the results of such…

Science & Tech
7
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

8
University of Miami
9
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Early Childhood Initiative Inc and the most unlike its peers is Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community FederationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsEducation Equity LeadershipDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceHomeless Services & ShelterUnited Way Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%5%<5yr16%8%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr9%18%35–55yr12%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%1%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr15%7%20–35yr9%2%35–55yr12%88%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,004

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
22/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC — $271,540 · OtherHISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INCJACK MILLER CENTER — $175,000 · OtherJACK MILLER CENTERTEMPLE BETH AM — $33,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AMCAL STATE FULLERTON PHIL FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Other+25 more — $97,876 · Other+25 moreGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $334,120 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH…GIRLS INC — $138,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCGIRLS INCORPORATED — $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentEARLY CHILDHOOD INITIATIVE INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $80,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $19,181 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI…KEY BISCAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $7,075 · Philanthropy+3 moreMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $47,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE — $5,000 · Education+3 more — $3,360 · EducationCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesREFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation — $3,750 · Human ServicesBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $13,600 · InternationalAYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $1,000 · International
Other$607,416Employment$334,120Youth Development$148,500Philanthropy$111,256Education$85,360Human Services$30,750International$14,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $334,120 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC — $271,540 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetGIRLS INC — $138,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $47,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $19,181 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $13,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMILLUS HOUSE INC — $11,423 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP — $10,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE ASSISTANCE ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED — $5,500 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetDADE HERITAGE TRUST INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEY BISCAYNE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation — $2,575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Compassion Fellowship Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetISAIAH HOUSE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $1,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAYITI COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $999 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · The Kirk Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greiner Weiser Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Refugee Assistance Alliance Inc92% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of South Florida Inc24% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc23% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc2% of income from government
  • Historical Association of Southern Florida Inc2% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Greiner Weiser Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Greiner Weiser Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph