· Private foundation
Greenstone Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $178k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INW Pop Warner Football | $50,000 |
| Famil Promise of Spokane | $30,000 |
| BIG TABLE | $25,000 |
| Our Place Community Ministries | $25,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY NEW BEGINNINGS | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $22,000 |
| Hope School | $20,740 |
| Spark Central | $18,750 |
| GIZMO | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Riverbend School | $2,616 |
| CHILDRENS'S VILLAGE | $2,000 |
| Women and Children Free | $1,394 |
| Post Falls Wrestiling e | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +116% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
OUR PLACE COMMUNITY OUTREACH7× · 2018–2025 · $180k · revenue +116%- FPFamily Promise of Spokane5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +298%
- PIPARTNERS INLAND NORTHWEST3× · 2018–2020 · $33k · revenue +163%
Funded once
- RWREACH WEST CENTRALone grant, 2020 · $30k
- SVSpokane Valley Meals On Wheelsone grant, 2020 · $8k
- SSSINTO SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTERone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.
Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity-Spokane adheres to a…
Canopys mission is to create a community where refugees and immigrants are welcomed and equiped with all they need to build new lives. Canopys vision is to see refugees and our community model thriving together.
Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Program offerings include rotational shelter with on-site case management, homeless prevention appointments, rapid rehousing/diversion appointments, volunteer activities, administrative operations, daily living tasks for families & on-site…
To provide food, shelter, clothing and other services to people in need in our community.
The mission of Summit is to equip people to build authentic communities that embrace freedom through God's love, foster hope, demonstrate compassion, and help people discover their true God-given identity and purpose.
The Spokane Parks Foundation cultivates the health, growth, and continued enjoyment of our communities by inspiring giving and passion for our parks.
To reflect the heart of God by feeding, sheltering, clothing, healing and empowering those in need. Programs include housing, a cafe and job training system, shelter resources, and more. Our core values are: compassion, respect, joy and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners Inland Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Pavillion Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Spark Central ↗
- Who funds OUR PLACE COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Spokane ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds The Big Table ↗
- Who funds NEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds SINTO SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NAOMI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PAVILLION PARK ↗
- Who funds THE HUTTON SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds Coeur d Alene Area Swim Team ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds MURCIS MISSION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Project Beauty Share · Women Helping Women Fund · Numerica Credit Union · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greenstone Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greenstone Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Greenstone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.