· Public charity
Foundation for Health Equity
FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH EQUITY supports communities of nw philadelphia by building on the assets of organizations that work to address systemic health inequities in order to build healthy, vibrant neighborhoods.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $635,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $648,807 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,807 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k11 grants · $299k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
- $250k+1 grant · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GWYNEDD MERCY UNIVERSITY | $275,000 |
| CENTER IN THE PARK | $61,000 |
| NORTHWEST MUTUAL AID COALITION | $41,000 |
| WHY NOT PROSPER INC | $31,000 |
| SHARE FOOD PROGRAM | $31,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA MIDWIFE COLLECTIVE | $29,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA CHILDRENS ALLIANCE | $26,000 |
| MATERNITY CARE COALITION | $26,000 |
| SMALL THINGS INC | $26,000 |
| FEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS | $26,000 |
| MANNA | $26,000 |
| STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE | $21,000 |
| SENIORLAW CENTER | $16,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $978k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICENTER IN THE PARK9× · 2017–2025 · $446k · revenue +9%
- SFSHARE FOOD PROGRAM8× · 2017–2025 · $281k · revenue +572%
- MCMaternity Care Coalition9× · 2017–2025 · $216k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +31%
- AFAFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +115%
- CHCHESTNUT HILL HOSPITALone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…
Public health management corporation (phmc) is a nonprofit public health institute that creates and sustains healthier communities. phmc uses best practices to improve community health through direct service, partnership, innovation,…
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…
To nurture families with children who are struggling against economic and environmental odds, giving them the critical resources, life skills and supportive partnerships to create stronger families and raise children with hope for a…
None
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
Together for West Philadelphia partners with healthcare systems community-based organizations, academic institutions, and public and private stakeholders to achieve equitable health outcomes for West Philadelphians.
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
Mentoring and educational programs for female youth
The mission of pmhcc is to improve service and recovery opportunities for persons who are challenged by serious and/or prolonged mental illness, drug and alcohol abuse and/or other barriers to self-sufficiency, in support of those citizens…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henry J & Willemina B Kuhn Day Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER IN THE PARK ↗
- Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds GWYNEDD MERCY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VNA - COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Maternity Care Coalition ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MUTUAL AID COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WEAVERS WAY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗
- Who funds SMALL THINGS INC ↗
- Who funds SENIORLAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds Why Not Prosper Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE ↗
- Who funds NORTH LIGHT BOYS' CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE MONTCO PA ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO ↗
- Who funds CH PENNSYLVANIA UNDER - 21 ↗
- Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗
- Who funds KEYSTONE CARE ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MIDWIFE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds BREASTFEEDING RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHESTNUT HILL MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION-PLUS INC DBA EDUCATION PLUS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Starfinder Foundation ↗
- Who funds Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds DEPAUL USA INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTEDLY ↗
- Who funds ANTI-VIOLENCE PARTNERSHIP OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Committee for Dignity and Fairness for the Homeless Housing Development ↗
- Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PARTNERSHIPS ↗
- Who funds LAUREL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN FAMILY HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · The William Penn Foundation · Union Benevolent Association · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Barra Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundation for Health Equity funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.