· Public charity
Green Mountain Energy Sun Club
To enhance the quality of life through long-term, sustainable solutions that focus on people and the planet.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+1 grant · $464k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Make-A-Wish North Texas | $463,500 |
| Habitat for Humanity | $200,476 |
| Westchase District Community Fund | $200,000 |
| Houston Independent School District Foundation | $179,664 |
| Brother's Brother Foundation | $178,547 |
| Volunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments In | $169,000 |
| Wildlife Conservatory Society | $144,088 |
| City Park Foundation | $130,000 |
| South Dallas Fair Park Innercity Community Develop | $129,438 |
| Recipe for Success | $128,320 |
| New York Sun Works | $115,213 |
| Regional Plan Association | $114,686 |
| The Creating Landscapes Learning Center Inc | $108,600 |
| Young Audiences Inc of Houston | $50,000 |
| Global Links | $26,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Urban Harvest is transforming food accessibility in Greater Houston through partnerships with local farmers and gardeners, vibrant Farmers Markets and mobile markets, and comprehensive garden education. Our goal is not just to improve, but…
The Houston Parks Board mission is to expand, improve, and protect parks and greenspace in the Houston region.
Brooklyn Heights Community Garden cultivates healthy community through growing food, intergenerational learning and creative play.
The Houston Parks Board Foundation provides the Houston Parks Board with financial assistance to support operations and park projects.
Improving public and park land communities using educational and vocational training for underserved youth.
Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.
The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.
LANLT's mission is to grow healthier, safer, and stronger communities by creating urban parks and community gardens that remedy the critical lack of green and recreational spaces in greater Los Angeles' underserved neighborhoods.
To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.
The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.
We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.
Denver urban gardens' (dug) mission is to provide access, skills, and resources for people to grow healthy food in community and regenerate urban green spaces.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of North Texas and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds GROW PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WESTCHASE DISTRICT COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Houston Independent School District Foundation ↗
- Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds Volunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds ASSETS LANCASTER ↗
- Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DALLAS FAIR PARK INNERCITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Recipe for Success Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SUN WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CREATING LANDSCAPES LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER ↗
- Who funds Target Hunger Inc ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN URBAN GARDEN CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AUDIENCES INC OF HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON COMMUNITY TOOLBANK INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL LINKS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Mechia Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Green Mountain Energy Sun Club funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Green Mountain Energy Sun Club?
Find your warmest path to Green Mountain Energy Sun Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.