· Public charity
Greater Bergen Realtors Care Foundation Inc
To provide grants to local charitable, educational and other nonprofit organizations that fall within the meaning of irc 501(c)(3)
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $62,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $201,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $138,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY | $15,500 |
| YCS FOUNDATION | $10,350 |
| SPRING LAKE TOYS FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| TOMORROWS CHILDRENS FUND | $8,000 |
| OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN | $7,600 |
| THE CTC ACADEMY INC | $7,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LOWER BERGEN C | $6,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC5× · 2020–2024 · $89k · revenue +2%- CFCENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +38%
- YCYOUTH CONSULTATION SERVICE INC3× · 2020–2022 · $44k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- RWROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +48%
- GSGERIATRIC SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +43%
- TTTABLE TO TABLE INCone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide enhanced opportunities for all citizens of bergen and passaic counties with intellectual and other disabilities and their families through advocacy, community education, direct services, and customized supports to help these…
To assist with the integration of individuals with developmental disabilities into society. to educate the public regarding every individual's right and need for community integration. to promote, establish, and operate community based…
Carelink community support services of new jersey's mission is to assist adult citizens of nj living with psychiatric disability in acquiring the tools necessary to live health and fulfilling lives.
Schi disability services (sds) is dedicated to providing a variety of needed services to individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities and their families in a way that preserves their dignity and integrity, while improving their…
The organization's primary mission is to enable developmentally disabled individuals to develop fully within the structure of family life which encourages responsibility, growth, and independence.
To serve the expanding and evolving in-home needs of residents of northern nj by delivering a continuum of care for clients and families through the services of a highly trained caring and compassionate workforce.
The organization's mission is to promote mental health, wellness, and hope for recovery for all individuals and families through compassionate care, expert treatment, advocacy, education, prevention, and early intervention.
To build the skills of individuals with varying abilities and developmental needs, by providing clinical treatment, community integration, vocational training and work opportunities in order to achieve and maintain productive lives.
Tiegerman community services, inc. (tcs) offers adults with developmental disabilities a supportive and nurturing environment that promotes a lifetime of personal growth, learning and self-esteem. the program is designed to assist…
To provide kosher, nonsectarian living arrangements for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.
To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.
To identify children's needs through research, policy and legal analysis, to raise awareness of those needs through strategic communications, and to work with elected officials and other decision-makers to enact effective responses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bergen County Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Transition Professionals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CONSULTATION SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CTC ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PASCACK VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds YCS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER CENTER OF BERGEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Spectrum Works Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds BERGEN COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM FOR LIVING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOWER BERGEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Spring Lake Toys Foundation Inc DBA- Spring Lake Hope Foundation ↗
- Who funds TOMORROWS CHILDREN'S FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GERIATRIC SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TABLE TO TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds BACKPACKS FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION PROFESSIONALS ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS IN AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds ADLER APHASIA CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Td Charitable Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Owens Group Foundation Inc · The Kaplen Foundation · Kearnybank Foundation Inc · Henry & Marilyn Taub Foundation · Bogota Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Bergen Realtors Care Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Transition Professionals — 56% of income from government
- Spectrum Works Inc — 40% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- Adler Aphasia Center — 12% of income from government
- Youth Consultation Service Inc — 6% of income from government
- Volunteer Center of Bergen County Inc — 4% of income from government
- Children's Aid and Family Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Greater Bergen Realtors Care Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Greater Bergen Realtors Care Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.