· Private foundation
Bogota Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of BOGOTA SAVINGS BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAIRLEIGH DICKENSON UNIVERSITY | $41,600 |
| CENTER FOR FOOD ACTIONS-NJ | $14,144 |
| UPPER SADDLE RIVER CARES | $14,143 |
| YOUTH CONSULTING SERVICE FOUNDATION | $14,143 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY | $13,000 |
| RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE | $10,260 |
| ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CARL INSERRA LEUKEMIA FONDATION | $5,000 |
| ED LUCAS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NEW JERSEY SHARING NETWORK | $4,600 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| MAOLI CHARTIABLE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE | $2,000 |
| VANTAGE HEALTH SYSTEM | $1,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HNHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC4× · 2020–2023 · $52k · revenue +58%
Fairleigh Dickinson University2× · 2023–2024 · $49k · revenue +9%- RARAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- HUHACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CHARIone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $8k
- MCMADELINE CORPORATIONone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.
Helping individuals, including veterans, and their families, overcome mental illness, addiction, homelessness and poverty by providing housing and support services.
This agency is dedicated to excellence in mental healthcare and has commitment to life- long support needed by individuals and their families to ensure that they achieve their full potential to improve the quality of their lives.
The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…
New hope integrated behavioral health care, inc., a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, provides commission on the accreditation of rehabilitation facilities (carf) and nj licensed substance use and co-occurring mental health disorder…
The organization's mission is to promote mental health, wellness, and hope for recovery for all individuals and families through compassionate care, expert treatment, advocacy, education, prevention, and early intervention.
The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…
To provide short term, transitional and permanent housing, homelessness prevention, personalized case management, mental health care, on-site nursing, vocational training, substance abuse counseling, recreational activities and other vital…
The mission of bergen county's united way is to connect community members in need with resources through nj211, to stabilize families on the verge of losing their housing through the compassion fund and to develop affordable housing for…
Rwj barnabas health, inc. operates as the parent entity of a tax-exempt multi-entity healthcare system. the organization coordinates, supervises and ensures the continuation and improvement of the quality of healthcare services in a cost…
Our mission is the prevention of domestic violence through the protection and empowerment of the victim, the rehabilitation of family members, the advocacy for social reform to prevent partner violence, and the education of the public…
The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bergen County Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fairleigh Dickinson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BERGEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds RAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Ed Lucas Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM FOR LIVING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VANTAGE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER - SOUTHERN CAMPUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BERGEN COUNTY COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MADELINE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Josephine's Place Inc ↗
- Who funds Dottie's House Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CONSULTATION SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOMESHARING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Kearnybank Foundation Inc · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · Greater Bergen Realtors Care Foundation Inc · The Community Chest of Englewood · Owens Group Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bogota Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope and Safety Inc — 69% of income from government
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
- Vantage Health System Inc — 19% of income from government
- Women's Rights Information Center — 16% of income from government
- Youth Consultation Service Inc — 6% of income from government
- Freedom House Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairleigh Dickinson University — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bogota Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Bogota Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.