· Private foundation
Grant & Christine Kurtz Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAKER SENIOR CENTER | $10,000 |
| MENO LIFE | $10,000 |
| NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC | $7,000 |
| GIVEWELL | $4,500 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS | $4,500 |
| ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC | $3,000 |
| BAPTIST GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA | $3,000 |
| HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| A HAND OF HOPE | $3,000 |
| TSF - THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTNS | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD - SW & CENTRAL FL | $2,500 |
| SUMMIT COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER | $2,500 |
| PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER | $2,000 |
| MEN OF ARMOR | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC6× · 2018–2023 · $47k · revenue +145%- OWOHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY7× · 2018–2025 · $42k · revenue +44%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- BCBIG CREEK MISSIONSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +39%
- BOBAPTISTS ON MISSION-DISASTER RELIEFone grant, 2022 · $4k
- SJST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA AUXone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
To create innovative opportunities to enrich the lives of older adults
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Honoring every moment of life, pathways hospice provides compassionate, excellent, comprehensive care for those who have an advanced medical condition and those who are grieving.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve
Piedmont healthcare, inc., ("phc") is organized exclusively for the benefit of, to manage the functions of, and to carry out the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of its subsidiary organizations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nch Healthcare System Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOORINGS PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds With Love From Jesus Ministries ↗
- Who funds BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds MENO LIFE ↗
- Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds A HAND OF HOPE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
- Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds COPD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG CREEK MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds MEN OF ARMOR INC ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH MERCY CHELSEA INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Building Hope Summit County ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Grant & Christine Kurtz Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.