Skip to content

· Private foundation

Graham R Putnam Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$281k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$169kHuman Services$145kPublic Safety & Disaster$134kEducation$126kHealth$105kHousing & Shelter$62kArts & Culture$36kPhilanthropy$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $192k
$6,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN$25,000
FAITH IN ACTION$20,000
UNITED METHODIST COMMITEE ON RELIEF$20,000
WEST SIDE CHURCH$17,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
CHELSEA FIRST UNITED METHODIST$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ALUMNI ASSOC$15,000
RESILIENCE$10,000
ENCORE MUSICAL THEATER$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$10,000
HOPE WESTERN PRISON EDUCATION PROGR$10,000
ALPHA HOUSE$7,000
ANN ARBOR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$6,000
GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESILIENCE: $10k → 8%RESILIENCE: $10k → 8%HOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD: $5k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $20k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $20k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $15k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $15k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $15k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $10k → 14%OUR HOUSE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$771k · 26 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$771k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+22%

Still filing today

42%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FAITH IN ACTION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +5%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +2%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • LS
    LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • MO
    MUSES OF DIONYSUS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Fort Wayne Inc

Humane fort wayne is a trusted partner providing comprehensive, lifesaving resources to pets and their people.

Animals
2
Humane Society of Saginaw County Incorporated

The Betterment of the lives of stray, owned and abandoned companion animals in Saginaw County, MI. Our county has over 20,000 households living below the federal poverty guidelines that own at least one pet. We are their safety net. We…

Animals
3
Helping Animals Live & Overcome in

Helping animals live and overcome (h.a.l.o.) provides a no-kill safe haven where extraordinary measures are taken to save homeless pets and protect them from abuse and neglect. we continually refine our programs to maintain a 98% save…

Animals
4
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
5
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
6
Washtenaw Housing Alliance

The mission of the washtenaw housing alliance is to end homelessness in our community.

Housing & Shelter
7
Humane Society of Southwestern Michigan

Humane society of southwestern michigan exists to provide shelter and care for sick, homeless and unwanted animals. in addition, the organization provides adoption services for the animals in its care.

Animals
8
Habitat for Humanity of Lapeer - Tuscola

To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.

—
9
Women's Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh

The mission of women's center & shelter of greater pittsburgh is to strengthen our ability to meet the individual and evolving needs of those affected by domestic violence by investing in the growth of our people, deepening community…

Human Services
10
The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.

Animals
11
Habitat for Humanity Serving Winona County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity serving winona county…

—
12
Habitat for Humanity Capital Region Inc

To improve our communities by providing and maintaining safe, healthy, affordable homeownership opportunities for low-to-moderate income community members, in partnership with volunteers and organizations throughout the community.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Resilience Advocates for Ending Violence; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ALUMNI ASSOC: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ALUMNI ASSOCWEST SIDE CHURCH: $79,000 · OtherWEST SIDE CHURCHUNITED METHODIST COMMITEE ON RELIEF: $77,500 · OtherUNITED METHODIST COMMITEE ON RELIEFAMERICAN RED CROSS: $56,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSUniversity of Michigan: $35,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganDEXTER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherGRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $26,000 · OtherCHELSEA FIRST UNITED METHODIST: $25,000 · Other+19 more: $174,000 · Other+19 moreFAITH IN ACTION INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION I…RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $20,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENCE ADVOCA…All-Options: $10,000 · Human ServicesAll-OptionsHOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD: $5,000 · Human ServicesOUR HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $40,000 · HealthTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $10,000 · HealthHOLLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $10,000 · HealthHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC: $11,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 · AnimalsGROWING HOPE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG AUDIENCES INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$602,500Human Services$135,000Health$60,000Housing & Shelter$42,000Animals$17,500Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAITH IN ACTION INC: $95,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $40,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $35,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAll-Options: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOLLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHTENAW LITERACY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds All-Options ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WASHTENAW LITERACY ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE BY THE SIDE OF THE ROAD ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG AUDIENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Washtenaw CountyMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Washtenaw County · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Graham R Putnam Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Graham R Putnam Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Graham R Putnam Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph