· Private foundation
Golden Community Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLOC MINISTRIES | $17,290 |
| INFAITH | $17,000 |
| NEW LIFE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $16,250 |
| MIDWESTERN CHILDREN'S HOME | $12,569 |
| INVICTUS MEN MINISTRY | $12,000 |
| CITY GOSPEL MISSION | $10,561 |
| 21C INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,000 |
| TEAM EXPANSION | $6,157 |
| THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT | $5,000 |
| HAVEN HOUSE | $5,000 |
| RISE UP MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS | $5,000 |
| INDIA GOSPEL LEAGUE | $2,676 |
| CITY SERVE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BMBLOC MINISTRIES INC4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +36%
- MCMID-WESTERN CHILDRENS HOME INC2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +2%
- CGCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- HFHOPE FOUNDATION OF KENYAone grant, 2023 · $21k · revenue +21%
- 1M1HOPE MINISTRIESone grant, 2023 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
A Christ-centered long-term 12-18 months or longer residential program that helps individuals who are addicted or broken to have victory through Jesus Christ. The program focuses on the 4 core values of Discipleship Addiction Recovery…
To lift people out of poverty by responding to human need with the love of christ.
Ecumenical & non-denominational, the house of hope provides flexible, individualized and immediate need to those in crisis.
Biblical counseling
Provide care to hurting and troubled children and families.
To extend christ's call to love your neighbor through housing, healthcare, crisis intervention, and building community for children, youth, families, and senior adults.
The mission of inner city mission is to provide what is needed to help homeless children, their parents, and single women find their way home.
Helping the most hurting through Gospel centered counseling; while inviting and equipping their community to engage with grace and truth.
Our mission motivated by the love of christ, we exist to spiritually encourage, technically equip, and financially suppot local leaders serving persecuted christians around the globe.
Hope gospel mission exists to offer christ-centered, life changing help to the homeless and needy in western wisconsin.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections to Success and the most unlike its peers is Love the Lou. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLOC MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MID-WESTERN CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOUNDATION OF KENYA ↗
- Who funds SINGLE PARENT PROVISION ↗
- Who funds INFAITH ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS TO SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds 21C International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE THE LOU ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE OF PICKAWAY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA GOSPEL LEAGUE INC N AMERICA ↗
- Who funds The Healing Center ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds HIS EYES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Golden Community Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Golden Community Inc?
Find your warmest path to Golden Community Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.