Skip to content
Go Campaign at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Go Campaign

GO CAMPAIGN improves the lives of orphans and vulnerable children throughout the world by supporting impactful grassroots organizations that are changing the lives of children and youth in their communities.

$802k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.5MFood & Nutrition$345kEducation$343kHuman Services$282kCrime & Legal$213kInternational$140kHousing & Shelter$62kCommunity Improvement$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $51,511, the rows itemized in this filing. The $801,911 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $750,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
$10,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPTON GIRLS CLUB$12,500
YOUNG STEAMERS$12,000
FUTURE TIES$10,800
GENERATION HER$10,711
TWINSPIRE$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $504k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Oglala Lakota Childrens Justice Center: $17k → 42%CONSCIOUS YOUTH GLOBAL NETWORK: $49k → 14%Conscious Youth Global Network: $23k → 14%CONSCIOUS YOUTH GLOBAL NETWORK: $17k → 14%CONSCIOUS YOUTH GLOBAL NETWORK: $2k → 14%Loving Hands: $21k → 14%Loving Hands: $8k → 14%LOVING HANDS: $7k → 14%Generation Her: $21k → 14%Generation HER: $18k → 14%GENERATION HER: $17k → 14%GENERATION HER: $17k → 14%Generation Her: $14k → 14%GENERATION HER: $11k → 14%GENERATION HER: $11k → 14%GENERATION HER: $10k → 14%GENERATION HER: $3k → 14%Refugee Children Center: $30k → 14%Avalon Carver Community Center: $164k → 14%ACCC: $43k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
SD
CA
LA
MS
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $719k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$639k · 89% · 21 grants

Stated purpose: SKILLS ACADEMY · SUSTAINABLE FUTURES FOR YOUTH · FOOD INITIATIVE

South Asia$73k · 10% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: HEALTH CARE ACCESS · RURAL PRIMARY EDUCATION EXPANSION · YOUTH FOR EQUITY AND SOCIAL CHANGE

Russia and Neighboring States$8k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: LIFE SKILLS FOR ORPHANS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 20 repeat orgs$349k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
19

Total granted

$2.8M
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+53%

Still filing today

85%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FUTURE TIES INC NFP
    4× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +125% · 69% of their budget
  • C
    CLEANSLATE-LA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +3% · 46% of their budget
  • SPRING INITIATIVE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $130k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • GC
    GOOD CITY MENTORS
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -52%
  • LA
    Los Angeles Room & Boardgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +772%
  • LA
    LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Avenue Community Action Inc

Provide resources, education and services to the underserved African-American youth population in Los Angeles.

Community Improvement
2
Girls for Empowerment

Counseling young girls mental health

—
3
D E S T I N E D to Succeed Inc

Youth Family Development for Grades 7-12 - After School Empowerment

Youth Development
4
Girlsmart Literacy Program
Youth Development
5
Youth Mentoring Action Network

A youth organization that facilitates transformative MENTORING, EDUCATION, and WELLNESS opportunities for young people.

Education
6
Tao of Tomorrow

Nonprofit empowering leadership, culture

Public Benefit
7
Los Angeles Team Mentoring Inc

Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.

Youth Development
8
Simply Girls Incorporated

Serve girls 6-16 through Afterschool and summer enrichment programs. Providing mentorship and encouragement for all girls.

Youth Development
9
Boys 2 Gentlemen Leadership Inc

Boys 2 Gentlemen Leadership, Inc.'s mission is to deliver a continuum of prevention, assessment, intervention, and treatment to at-risk boys/girls by assisting in cultivating new dreams. We will empower them to create a roadmap to make…

Human Services
10
Asian Youth Center

Ayc's mission is to meet the educational and social service needs of low-income, immigrant, at-risk, and adjudicated youth and families of all ethnicities, with a special cultural and linguistic competence with asian americans. by…

Human Services
11
Urban Compass

Urban Compass provides a safe, welcoming, and innovative environment that challenges our youth to envision and navigate a course for a rewarding future characterized by achievement, independent thought, and social responsibility through…

Youth Development
12
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Future Ties Inc Nfp; the most unlike its peers is Watts Community Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FUTURE TIES INC NFP: $1,004,743 · Youth DevelopmentFUTURE TIES INC NFPG Irl: $53,000 · Youth Development+5 more: $75,823 · Youth Development+5 moreAVALON-CARVER COMMUNITY CENTER: $298,742 · Human ServicesAVALON-CARVER COMM…GENERATION HER: $122,015 · Human ServicesGENERATION HERLOVING HANDS COMMUNITY CARE INC: $36,034 · Human ServicesLOVING HANDS COMMU…SAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC: $30,351 · Human ServicesSAN FERNANDO VALLE…+1 more: $16,614 · Human ServicesWATTS COMMUNITY CORE: $302,456 · Community ImprovementWATTS COMMUNITY…COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $111,606 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTN…SPRING INITIATIVE INC: $130,499 · EducationSPRING INIT…FREEDOM 4 YOUTH: $52,762 · EducationFREEDOM 4 Y…Twinspire Together We Inspire: $45,250 · EducationTwinspire T…Lincoln Heights Tutorial Program: $43,796 · EducationLincoln Hei…EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC: $32,000 · EducationEMPOWHER IN…CREATE NOW INC: $25,000 · EducationCREATE NOW …ROSEDALE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $41,189 · OtherROSEDALE COMM…GOOD CITY MENTORS: $39,692 · OtherGOOD CITY MEN…LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $35,000 · OtherLAS AMERICAS …PRIDE IN TRUTH: $34,096 · OtherPRIDE IN TRUT…MEDIA4GOOD INC: $32,681 · OtherMEDIA4GOOD IN…READ IT AND LEAVE IT INC: $30,000 · OtherREAD IT AND L…LOS COURAGE CAMPS: $28,800 · OtherLOS COURAGE C…COMMUNITY HEALING GARDEN: $18,368 · OtherSPIRITS LANDING: $13,750 · OtherLos Angeles Room & Board: $35,233 · OtherLos Angeles R…GLOBAL GIRL MEDIA: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $44,330 · Other+5 moreCLEANSLATE-LA: $199,878 · Crime & LegalHOMIES UNIDOS INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalMINORITY HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $163,577 · International+1 more: $550 · International
Youth Development$1,133,566Human Services$503,756Community Improvement$414,062Education$329,307Other$368,139Crime & Legal$214,878International$164,127

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFUTURE TIES INC NFP: $1,004,743 over 4y, 69% of budgetAVALON-CARVER COMMUNITY CENTER: $298,742 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCLEANSLATE-LA: $199,878 over 8y, 46% of budgetMINORITY HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $163,577 over 5y, 59% of budgetGENERATION HER: $122,015 over 8y, 25% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $111,606 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetG Irl: $53,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetFREEDOM 4 YOUTH: $52,762 over 2y, 52% of budgetTwinspire Together We Inspire: $45,250 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetLincoln Heights Tutorial Program: $43,796 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetROSEDALE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $41,189 over 3y, 14% of budgetLos Angeles Room & Board: $35,233 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $35,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetMEDIA4GOOD INC: $32,681 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetEMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC: $32,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetSAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC: $30,351 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetKings Against Violence Initiative Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCREATE NOW INC: $25,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetOglala Lakota Childrens Justice Center Inc: $16,614 over 1y, 11% of budgetGLOBAL GIRL MEDIA: $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetYoung STEAMers: $12,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES DRAMA CLUB INC: $11,200 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $7,285 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetRedeemer Community Partnership: $7,079 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTHE BEAUTIFUL FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetKGSA FOUNDATION: $550 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg Foundat…California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationTides FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…Liberty Hill Foundati…Jewish Community Foun…Local Initiatives Sup…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Pfizer Foundation…
The Annenberg FoundationPA19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Liberty Hill Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Go Campaign funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Go Campaign. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Go Campaign’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home