· Public charity
Go Campaign
GO Campaign improves the lives of orphans and vulnerable children throughout the world by supporting impactful grassroots organizations that are changing the lives of children and youth in their communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $183,699 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $971,743 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $788,044 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cleanslate Initiative | $40,000 |
| Refugee Children Center | $30,351 |
| Read it & Leave it | $30,000 |
| Los Courage Camp | $28,800 |
| Compton Girls Club | $27,500 |
| Generation Her | $14,167 |
| Rootdown LA | $12,881 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $493k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $758k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 13 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Construction · Misc. Support Exp · Staff & Family Exp
Stated purpose: Computer&AudioTrain · Construction · Educational Support
Stated purpose: Education & Worksho · Holistic Mental Hea · Swin & Lifeguard Tr
Stated purpose: Educational Srvcs · Escuela de Paz Proj · Mental Health Srvcs
Stated purpose: School Fees · Youth Empowerment
Stated purpose: Mentorship Program
Stated purpose: Apprenticeship
Stated purpose: FamilyEmergencySupp
Stated purpose: Teacher&Student Exp
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFUTURE TIES INC NFP3× · 2019–2021 · $994k · revenue +36% · 69% of their budget
- CCLEANSLATE-LA8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +3% · 46% of their budget
SPRING INITIATIVE INC3× · 2017–2019 · $130k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- GCGOOD CITY MENTORSone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue -52%
- LALos Angeles Room & Boardgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +772%
- LALAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide resources, education and services to the underserved African-American youth population in Los Angeles.
Counseling young girls mental health
Youth Family Development for Grades 7-12 - After School Empowerment
A youth organization that facilitates transformative MENTORING, EDUCATION, and WELLNESS opportunities for young people.
Boys 2 Gentlemen Leadership, Inc.'s mission is to deliver a continuum of prevention, assessment, intervention, and treatment to at-risk boys/girls by assisting in cultivating new dreams. We will empower them to create a roadmap to make…
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
To provide educational training and development for youth to succeed in college, business, and life.
Ayc's mission is to meet the educational and social service needs of low-income, immigrant, at-risk, and adjudicated youth and families of all ethnicities, with a special cultural and linguistic competence with asian americans. by…
Serve girls 6-16 through Afterschool and summer enrichment programs. Providing mentorship and encouragement for all girls.
Provide counseling, gang prevention and intervention services, case management, athletic activities, job readiness training and development and other services to disadvantaged youth in the san fernando valley and greater los angeles area.
Urban Compass provides a safe, welcoming, and innovative environment that challenges our youth to envision and navigate a course for a rewarding future characterized by achievement, independent thought, and social responsibility through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Create Now Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kgsa Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 13% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FUTURE TIES INC NFP ↗
- Who funds WATTS COMMUNITY CORE ↗
- Who funds AVALON-CARVER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CLEANSLATE-LA ↗
- Who funds MINORITY HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPRING INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds GENERATION HER ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM 4 YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Heights Tutorial Program ↗
- Who funds ROSEDALE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds G Irl ↗
- Who funds Twinspire Together We Inspire ↗
- Who funds GOOD CITY MENTORS ↗
- Who funds LOVING HANDS COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Room & Board ↗
- Who funds LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MEDIA4GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Kings Against Violence Initiative Inc ↗
- Who funds CREATE NOW INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLFORWARD ↗
- Who funds Oglala Lakota Childrens Justice Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GIRL MEDIA ↗
- Who funds HOMIES UNIDOS INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE VOICES ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES DRAMA CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS MENTORS GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds THE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Redeemer Community Partnership ↗
- Who funds THE BEAUTIFUL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KGSA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Liberty Hill Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Go Campaign funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.