· Private foundation
Global Village Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $182k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $518k
- $250k+1 grant · $425k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $425,000 |
| CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA | $180,000 |
| BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART | $151,094 |
| FRESHGRASS PUBLIC FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| GLENS FALLS YOUTH CENTER | $87,000 |
| WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $36,000 |
| BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| UNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES | $20,223 |
| MUSEUMS MOVING FORWARD INC | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERITIES UNION INC | $18,000 |
| PRO PUBLICA | $18,000 |
| CENTER FOR ART RESEARCH AND ALLIANCE | $15,000 |
| ST ANNE'S SCHOOL | $10,111 |
| CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE | $10,104 |
| SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $252k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHIRD WAY INSTITUTE7× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +81%
- TMTHE MANAGEMENT CENTER7× · 2017–2023 · $2.7M · revenue +121%
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $2.4M · revenue +102%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $2.2M
- TLTHE LEWIS PRIZE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue -100% · 33% of their budget
- AFACLU FOUNDATION OF FLORIDAone grant, 2024 · $180k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
The mission of the princeton symphony orchestra is to leverage the power of live music to uplift the human experience.
The mission of lyrica baroque is to support a diverse community of students, teachers, artists, institutions and audiences of all ages through education, collaboration and performance. lyrica baroque seeks to promote the extraordinary…
The mission of florida grand opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera while supporting the operations of the greater miami opera and the opera guild, inc. by expanding its reach to diverse…
To offer accessible, high-quality performing arts education that sparks personal growth and builds inclusive communities. its vision is to transform performing arts education in an inclusive community accessible to all.
Please refer to schedule o for the organization's complete mission statement.
The charleston symphony's mission is to inspire and engage the community through exceptional musical performances and educational programs.
For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…
The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…
Present the world's greatest musical artists in chamber music concerts of classical and alternative genres for diverse audiences. offer music education to concert attendees, students, and aspiring young musicians.
The mission of the annapolis symphony orchestra is to inspire, educate and enrich lives near and far by creating extraordinary musical experiences with uncompromising artistic excellence.
We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philharmonic Symphony Society of Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Up Yonda Farm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THIRD WAY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MANAGEMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEWIS PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR NEW EDUCATION INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS AREA YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds OVERTOWN YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds Freshgrass Public Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
- Who funds GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Lake George Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · RJKB Family Charitable Foundation · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · D'Addario Foundation Inc · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Charles R Wood Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Bob & Ginger Cannon Bailey Foundation Inc · Peacock Foundation Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Global Village Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Connecticut — 14% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Miami Music Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nu Deco Ensemble Inc — 1% of income from government
- Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc — 1% of income from government
- Young Musicians Unite Inc — 0% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc — 0% of income from government
- New Jersey Performing Arts Center Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Master Chorale of South Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Seraphic Fire Inc — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Global Village Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Global Village Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.