· Private foundation
Glenn W Peel Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $59,500 |
| MARLANDS PLACE | $30,000 |
| RSVP OF KAY COUNTY | $17,500 |
| NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| NEWKIRK AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY | $6,000 |
| DEARING HOUSE | $5,500 |
| HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA | $5,000 |
| SCL FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| NEWKIRK COMMUNITY CHEST | $5,000 |
| NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC | $5,000 |
| NEWKIRK MAIN STREET | $2,500 |
| CORYELL CUPBOARD | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation5× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +74%- BPBlackwell Public School Foundation Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +140%
- MCMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC2× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +132%
Funded once
- ACARKANSAS CITY AREA ART COUNCIL INCone grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue -21%
- DTDALE TOWNSHIP FIRE DISTRICT ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $35k
- FBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Creation and maitenance of historical museum.
To preserve the places where Oklahoma history lives.
Economic development of woodward, ok and northwestern oklahoma.
To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students
To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma
To preserve the history of Claremore, Oklahoma
To be a catalyst for ethical, place-based community development from within.
Preserve the historical heritage of people living in the 50 mile radius of woodward, oklahoma for the publics benefit.
To assist persons with disabilities in obtaining assistive technology so they can become independent and productive members of the community.
To raise and administer funds for the benefit of the health care needs of residents of muskogee, oklahoma, and its immediate surrounding area.
To provide an animal shelter, adoption services, and spay/neuter services to pontotoc county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of North Central Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Newkirk Community Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS CITY AREA ART COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SLC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MARLAND'S GRAND HOME ↗
- Who funds Blackwell Public School Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEWKIRK COMMUNITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PONCA CITY AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Dearing House Inc ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds NEWKIRK MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds Standing Bear Native American Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WHEATHEART NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PONCA CITY ART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE PONCA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PONCAN THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Madalynne L Peel Foundation · Evans Family Foundation · Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glenn W Peel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Survivor Resource Network — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Glenn W Peel Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Glenn W Peel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.