· Private foundation
Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| AMERICORP SENIORS | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| NEW EMERGENCY RESOURC CENTER | $2,500 |
| PONCA CITY HUMANE SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| HOSPICE OF NO CENTRAL OK | $2,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $2,000 |
| DEARING HOUSE | $1,800 |
| PEACHTREE LANDING | $1,800 |
| PONCA VETERAN DAY PARADE | $1,500 |
| MARLANDS PLACE | $1,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL OK | $900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DHDearing House Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +104%
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF KAY COUNTY INC7× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +66%
- HOHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA6× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- MRMEDICAL RESEARCH OF OKone grant, 2019 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons
The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.
Pug Rescue Owasso mission is to rescue abused, abandoned, homeless, unwanted , sick and injured pugs. we rehabilitate them medically and emotionally and place them into homes
Provides mental health services, case management, and placement services and prevention and educaiton programs to youth and families in the oklahoma panhandle.
To promote a healthy community, utilizing its resources and local volunteers to provide compassionate health care and other services to the medically under-served.
Christain Home
To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.
To assist in the ongoing battle of pet overpopulation in Oklahoma by offering a no kill shelter environment, responsible adoption, medical aid, and community outreach. We also intend to provide sanctuary to companion animals who's people…
To provide an animal shelter, adoption services, and spay/neuter services to pontotoc county.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
To restore the oral health of low-income, uninsured elderly and developmentally disabled oklahomans by providing free dental care to Oklahomans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of North Central Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dearing House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dearing House Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF KAY COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PEACHTREE LANDING INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds The Mission ↗
- Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds Child Development Center Ponca City Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Evans Family Foundation · Conocophillips Retirees Association Inc · Madalynne L Peel Foundation · Glenn W Peel Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of North Central Oklahoma Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.