· Private foundation
Madalynne L Peel Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $101k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN | $50,500 |
| NEWKIRK PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF KAY COUNTY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| TONKAWA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PONCA CITY EDUCATION FDN | $10,000 |
| NEWKIRK EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF NEWKIRK | $8,100 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF PONCA CITY | $5,000 |
| DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION | $1,600 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF NEWKIRK | $1,000 |
| PECKHAM CHRISTIAN CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $434k · revenue +49%- OCOPPORTUNITY CENTER INC3× · 2017–2020 · $88k · revenue +21%
- HOHOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA7× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- VHValley Hope Association Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +283%
- VHVALLEY HOPE OF CUSHING OKLAHOMAone grant, 2021 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $37k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma
To preserve the history of Claremore, Oklahoma
Support Will Rogers Memorial Museums
Promote and recognize ok musicians
The Oklahoma AIDS Care Fund is a fundraising and advocacy organization dedicated to providing financial support and resources to HIV/AIDS service providers in the state of Oklahoma. Our goal is to reduce new infections, stigma, and health…
To raise and administer funds for the benefit of the health care needs of residents of muskogee, oklahoma, and its immediate surrounding area.
Creation and maitenance of historical museum.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of North Central Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is American Legion Huff Minor Post 14. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Valley Hope Association Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ↗
- Who funds PONCA CITY ART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MARLAND'S GRAND HOME ↗
- Who funds SURVIVOR RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGION HUFF MINOR POST 14 ↗
- Who funds Blackwell Public School Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds NEWKIRK MAIN STREET INC ↗
- Who funds SLC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP MCFADDEN INC ↗
- Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Glenn W Peel Foundation · Evans Family Foundation · Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Madalynne L Peel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 42% of income from government
- Survivor Resource Network — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Madalynne L Peel Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Madalynne L Peel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.