How much does Glenn W Peel Foundation give?

Glenn W Peel Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $152,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Glenn W Peel Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (18%), Education (15%), Arts & Culture (13%).

Who are Glenn W Peel Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ($263k), Northern Oklahoma Humane Society ($106k), Arkansas City Area Art Council Inc ($75k).

Does Glenn W Peel Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Glenn W Peel Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Glenn W Peel Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Madalynne L Peel Foundation, Evans Family Foundation, Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc.

Where is Glenn W Peel Foundation based?

Glenn W Peel Foundation is based in OK.

Glenn W Peel Foundation

Glenn W Peel Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Glenn W Peel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$152k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$60k

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$285kEducation$239kArts & Culture$213kHuman Services$160kCommunity Improvement$152kPublic Safety & Disaster$107kAnimals$106kHousing & Shelter$89kOther$0

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k8 grants · $35k
$10k–50k3 grants · $58k
$50k–250k1 grant · $60k

$5,500

Median grant

States reached

$3.0M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION	$59,500
MARLANDS PLACE	$30,000
RSVP OF KAY COUNTY	$17,500
NORTHERN OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY	$10,000
NEWKIRK AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY	$6,000
DEARING HOUSE	$5,500
NEWKIRK COMMUNITY CHEST	$5,000
HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OKLAHOMA	$5,000
SCL FOUNDATION INC	$5,000
NEW EMERGENCY RESOURCE AGENCY INC	$5,000
NEWKIRK MAIN STREET	$2,500
CORYELL CUPBOARD	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.2M · 23 repeat orgs$447k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$422k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%

Still filing today

43%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
5× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +74%
BP
Blackwell Public School Foundation Inc
3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue +140%
MC
MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC
2× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +132%

Funded once

AC
ARKANSAS CITY AREA ART COUNCIL INC
one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue -21%
DT
DALE TOWNSHIP FIRE DISTRICT ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2024 · $35k
FB
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
one grant, 2024 · $25k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation

Arts & Culture

Oklahoma Pharmacy Heritage Foundation Inc

Creation and maitenance of historical museum.

Arts & Culture

Preservation Oklahoma Inc

To preserve the places where Oklahoma history lives.

—

Woodward Industrial Foundation

Economic development of woodward, ok and northwestern oklahoma.

—

Northwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc and Alumni Association

To provide support to NWOSU and scholarships to NWOSU students

Education

Southwest Historical Foundation

To preserve and protect museum artifacts of the south central area of oklahoma

Arts & Culture

Claremore Museum of History Inc

To preserve the history of Claremore, Oklahoma

Arts & Culture

Northeast Okc Renaissance Inc

To be a catalyst for ethical, place-based community development from within.

Community Improvement

Plains Indians and Pioneers Historical Foundation

Preserve the historical heritage of people living in the 50 mile radius of woodward, oklahoma for the publics benefit.

Arts & Culture

Oklahoma Assistive Technology Foundation

To assist persons with disabilities in obtaining assistive technology so they can become independent and productive members of the community.

Human Services

Muskogee Medical Foundation

To raise and administer funds for the benefit of the health care needs of residents of muskogee, oklahoma, and its immediate surrounding area.

Human Services

Pontotoc Animal Welfare Society

To provide an animal shelter, adoption services, and spay/neuter services to pontotoc county.

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of North Central Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Newkirk Community Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/26

Grantees still filing

12/26

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$949,615Health$268,256Arts & Culture$149,000Animals$106,000Education$56,462Human Services$38,000Employment$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Madalynne L Peel FoundationOK37× affinity15 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Madalynne L Peel Foundation · Evans Family Foundation · Marvin and Valoyce Musgrove Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Keeler-Matthews Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glenn W Peel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glenn W Peel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Glenn W Peel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Glenn W Peel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Glenn W Peel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home