· Private foundation
Glenn and Jane Fausz Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHWET OHIO CLASSICAL ACADEMY | $7,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,550 |
| TOLEDO CHORAL SOCIETY | $1,650 |
| CARENET | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| FAMILY HOUSE | $500 |
| MLK KITCHEN FOR THE POOR | $300 |
| KEEPING OUR KIDS SAFE | $250 |
| FOOD FOR THOUGHT | $250 |
| JUSTICE FOR SIERAH | $250 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $150 |
| BELLAVITA PREGNANCY CENTER | $150 |
| TOLEDO HUMANE SOCEITY | $100 |
| SYLVANIA AREA FAMILY SERVICES | $100 |
| SOUTHVIEW HIGH SCHOOL GOLF | $94 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCToledo Choral Society6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +30%
- BVBELLA VITA NETWORK5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +533%
- TCTOLEDO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- OUOPERATION UNDERGROUND RESCUEone grant, 2020 · $3k
- KKOGSone grant, 2022 · $3k
- TSTSUNAMI SWIM CLUBone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enforce laws preventing cruelty to animals and to provide affective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals.
Provide a content-rich education that stimulates the mind, feeds the hunger for learning, and nourishes the heart through a fully integrated liberal arts and sciences curriculum that includes instruction in moral character and civic virtue.
Protection of the welfare of unborn children council, assistance, and promotion of the sanctity of human life in the context of Christian witness.
Service to needy children.
The ywca of northwest ohio strives to be a powerful proactive force for the support and advancement of women and girls in our community that will continue to work for peace, justice, equality, and dignity for all people.
Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…
To ensure that all youth ages 0-5 have access to quality early learning programs and services regardless of race sex economic status or geographical location and the ability and the support necessary to enter kindergarten ready to learn…
Life House Youth Center's mission is to start a cycle of love by assisting the children and families of Franklin and Crawford Counties to discover their full potential regardless of their social/economic backgrounds. We envision a stronger…
To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…
Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.
Out mission is to disciple our students to delight, discern, and display the glory of god in jesus christ through classical, christian education. it emphasizes cultivating wonder, critical thinking skills, and paideia culture, and…
The mission of the bella womens centr is to demonstrate the compassion of jesus christ and provide pregnancy-related services that support life for both mother and child.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Service Center and the most unlike its peers is Higgins Lake Land Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Toledo Choral Society ↗
- Who funds Northwest Ohio Classical Academy ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BELLA VITA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FOR SIERAH ↗
- Who funds HIGGINS LAKE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE WINGMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds SYLVANIA AREA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The O-I Charities Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Toledo Classic Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glenn and Jane Fausz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.