Skip to content
Glasmann Dudley Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Glasmann Dudley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$47kHealth$22kHuman Services$20kRecreation & Sports$19kArts & Culture$9kEnvironment$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$136k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Utah Department of Orthopaedics$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%COTTAGES OF HOPE: $2k → 9%PEACE HOUSE: $4k → 5%COTTAGES OF HOPE: $800 → 9%PEACE HOUSE: $3k → 5%COTTAGES OF HOPE: $250 → 9%PEACE HOUSE: $3k → 5%COTTAGES OF HOPE: $250 → 9%PEACE HOUSE: $3k → 5%PEACE HOUSE: $2k → 5%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $2k → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $550 → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $500 → 8%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $200 → 8%PEACE HOUSE: $200 → 5%THE ROAD HOME: $750 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 12 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$76k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+96%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    Peace House Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +38%
  • PC
    Park City Education Foundation
    4× · 2019–2022 · $8k · revenue +78%
  • PH
    People's Health Clicnic
    5× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +426%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +142%
  • SL
    SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH ORTHOPAEDIC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
3
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
4
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
5
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
6
Utah Public Health Association

The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…

Health
7
Shelter Providers of Utah

To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

—
8
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
9
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
10
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
11
Utah Housing Coalition Inc

The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.

—
12
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Summit County Clubhouse; the most unlike its peers is Green Earth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Utah Department of Orthopaedics: $20,000 · OtherUniversity of Utah Department of Orthopa…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $8,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHSALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4,300 · OtherSALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH ORTHOPAEDIC: $2,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS SCHOOL: $1,500 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · Other+7 more: $5,100 · Other+7 morePeace House Inc: $14,700 · Human ServicesPeace House IncCottages of Hope Inc: $2,800 · Human ServicesCottages of Hope I…PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $2,750 · Human ServicesPEOPLE HELPING PEO…THE ROAD HOME: $750 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER UNIVER…Park City Education Foundation: $7,500 · EducationPark City Educatio…Kamas Valley Community Foundation: $2,000 · EducationKamas Valley Commu…OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationSUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE: $12,500 · HealthSUMMIT COUNTY CLU…People's Health Clicnic: $6,225 · HealthPeople's Health C…+1 more: $250 · HealthNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $18,950 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL ABILITY …HAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · AnimalsYOUTHLINC: $500 · InternationalGREEN EARTH INC: $500 · Environment
Other$44,600Human Services$21,000Education$20,500Health$18,975Recreation & Sports$18,950Animals$1,000International$500Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $18,950 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPeace House Inc: $14,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE: $12,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPark City Education Foundation: $7,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic: $6,225 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCottages of Hope Inc: $2,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $2,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKamas Valley Community Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHLINC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIT TO RECOVER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY CLUBHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Park City Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
  • Who funds Cottages of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds Kamas Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHLINC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN EARTH INC ↗
  • Who funds FIT TO RECOVER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…George S and Dolores …The Community Foundat…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Pacificorp Foundation…Dominion Energy Chari…Dr Wc Swanson Family …Marriner S Eccles Fou…David Kelby Johnson M…Ihc Health Services I…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Dr Wc Swanson Family Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glasmann Dudley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glasmann Dudley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glasmann Dudley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home