Skip to content
Give Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Give Foundation Inc

To increase overall charitable giving by creating a vibrant giving exchange

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$123k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 34 grants below total $1,089,289, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,172,492 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,203 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $736k
$14,306
Median grant
12
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Myriad USA$123,289
Myriad USA$117,083
Team Everest USA$95,817
Isha Foundation Inc$92,843
Myriad USA$75,987
Karuna Foundation$64,672
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$60,087
Sevalaya USA INC$53,888
Snehalaya USA$52,255
Udayan Care USA$44,605
Christel House International$36,594
BRAHM MADHYA GUADIYA VAISHNAV SOCIETY INC$22,851
Udayan Care USA$22,714
GoPhilanthropic Foundation$19,104
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSLIMS OF INDIAN ORIGIN$15,047
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Deepalaya Foundation Inc: $12k → 10%Heart of Hope: $9k → 9%Charutar Health Foundation Corp: $14k → 8%RELIEF FROM CANCER: $12k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sahayog Foundation
Community Improvement
2
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Rural India Child Education Fund Inc

Educate children in need

Education
4
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Shraman Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Vidya Girls Education Foundation
Education
7
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
8
Viju & Asha Charitable Foundation
—
9
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
10
Sadvidya Foundation

Education

Religion
11
Wadhwani Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Radiant Foundation

promotes & supports causes in healthcare, education, sustainable development, womens empowerment, and social justice through grassroot organizations in India and the United States.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa); the most unlike its peers is Sharanalayam. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
9/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MYRIAD USA INC: $316,359 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INCUDAYAN CARE USA: $67,319 · InternationalUDAYAN CARE USASEVALAYA USA INC: $53,888 · InternationalSEVALAYA USA INCCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $36,594 · InternationalCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INCINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $25,397 · International+5 more: $52,810 · International+5 moreTeam Everest USA: $95,817 · PhilanthropyTeam Everes…NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,197 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLE…ISHA FOUNDATION INC: $92,843 · EducationISHA FOUNDA…SHARANALAYAM: $7,763 · EducationSHARANALAYA…Milaan Foundation: $6,106 · EducationMilaan Foun…BRAHM MADHYA GUADIYA VAISHNAV SOCIETY INC: $22,851 · OtherBRAHM MAD…GoPhilanthropic Foundation: $19,104 · OtherGoPhilant…AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSLIMS OF INDIAN ORIGIN: $15,047 · OtherAMERICAN …EarthON Foundation: $14,306 · OtherEarthON F…Kidpower Business Services Package: $6,812 · OtherKidpower …MAITRI INDIA: $6,666 · OtherMAITRI IN…Individual grant recipient: $6,055 · OtherIndividua…Karuna Foundation: $64,672 · AnimalsCENTRE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES INC: $5,018 · AnimalsAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $60,087 · Food & NutritionSNEHALAYA USA: $52,255 · Crime & LegalCHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $13,918 · Human ServicesRELIEF FROM CANCER: $12,122 · Human ServicesDeepalaya Foundation Inc: $11,951 · Human ServicesHEART OF HOPE: $9,332 · Human Services
International$552,367Philanthropy$110,014Education$106,712Other$90,841Animals$69,690Food & Nutrition$60,087Crime & Legal$52,255Human Services$47,323

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeam Everest USA: $95,817 over 1y, 25% of budgetUDAYAN CARE USA: $67,319 over 1y, 21% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $60,087 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEVALAYA USA INC: $53,888 over 1y, 17% of budgetSNEHALAYA USA: $52,255 over 1y, 96% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSLIMS OF INDIAN ORIGIN: $15,047 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,197 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $13,918 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetRELIEF FROM CANCER: $12,122 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetDeepalaya Foundation Inc: $11,951 over 1y, 10% of budgetINDIA RURAL DEVELOPMENT FUND: $11,787 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetHEART OF HOPE: $9,332 over 1y, 22% of budgetMilaan Foundation: $6,106 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAsha for Education: $5,171 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundati…Analog Devices Founda…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Pfizer Foundation…AbbVie FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Globalgiving Foundation IncDC16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Give Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Give Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Give Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Give Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Give’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home