· Public charity
Give Foundation Inc
To increase overall charitable giving by creating a vibrant giving exchange
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 34 grants below total $1,089,289 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,172,492 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $83,203 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $292k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $736k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Myriad USA | $123,289 |
| Myriad USA | $117,083 |
| Team Everest USA | $95,817 |
| Isha Foundation Inc | $92,843 |
| Myriad USA | $75,987 |
| Karuna Foundation | $64,672 |
| AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA | $60,087 |
| Sevalaya USA INC | $53,888 |
| Snehalaya USA | $52,255 |
| Udayan Care USA | $44,605 |
| Christel House International | $36,594 |
| BRAHM MADHYA GUADIYA VAISHNAV SOCIETY INC | $22,851 |
| Udayan Care USA | $22,714 |
| GoPhilanthropic Foundation | $19,104 |
| AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSLIMS OF INDIAN ORIGIN | $15,047 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educate children in need
Missionary work in the nation of India
Education
promotes & supports causes in healthcare, education, sustainable development, womens empowerment, and social justice through grassroot organizations in India and the United States.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa) and the most unlike its peers is Sharanalayam. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds Team Everest USA ↗
- Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UDAYAN CARE USA ↗
- Who funds Karuna Foundation ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds SEVALAYA USA INC ↗
- Who funds SNEHALAYA USA ↗
- Who funds CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSLIMS OF INDIAN ORIGIN ↗
- Who funds Fatima Sheikh Savitribai Phule Mission ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP ↗
- Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds RELIEF FROM CANCER ↗
- Who funds Deepalaya Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIA RURAL DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds HEART OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds AARTI FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds Milaan Foundation ↗
- Who funds Asha for Education ↗
- Who funds CENTRE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Give Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc — 20% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Give Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Give Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.