Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gilligan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$403k
Granted FY2023
21
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$226kHuman Services$209kReligion$119kEducation$101kCivil Rights$74kFood & Nutrition$40kHealth$39kInternational$27kOther$0
02FY2023 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $234,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $403,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $169,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $195k
$11,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE & MINNEAPOLIS$25,000
PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING$20,000
AGATE HOUSING AND SERVICES$20,000
HAVEN HOUSING ASCENSION PLACE$17,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$15,000
IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA$15,000
RISEN CHRIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,000
SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH$13,000
WAYSIDE HOUSE$12,000
CHIRST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH$12,000
BASILICA OF ST. MARY$11,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
BREAD FOR THE WORLD INSTITUTE$10,000
CARMEN PAMPA FUND$7,000
PEACE HOUSE COMMUNITY$7,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$821k · 23 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
2

Total granted

$821k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+54%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalReligionHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $81k · revenue +56%
  • PF
    PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $72k · revenue +19%
  • CC
    Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago
    4× · 2020–2023 · $53k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • T
    TUBMANgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +54%
  • IA
    INTERFAITH ACTION OF GREATER SAINT PAUL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
2
Partners for Affordable Housing

Partners for Affordable Housing is missioned to provide shelter for homeless families and individuals and help them secure economically viable long term housing. The Organization owns and operates a number of scattered site housing…

—
3
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis

Catholic Charities of St. Paul and Minneapolis serves those most in need. Catholic Charities is a leader at solving poverty, creating opportunity, and advocating for justice in the community.

Human Services
4
The Dwelling Place

The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.

Human Services
5
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
6
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
9
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
10
The Family Place

Assisting families in shelters to gain more confidence in building future goals that will lead to success of the entire family.

—
11
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
12
St Patrick Center

St. patrick center transforms lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theresa Living Center; the most unlike its peers is Peace House Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE & MINNEAPOLIS: $93,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE & MINNEAPOLISHAVEN HOUSING ASCENSION PLACE: $61,000 · OtherHAVEN HOUSING ASCENSION PLACERISEN CHRIST SCHOOL: $55,500 · OtherRISEN CHRIST SCHOOLCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $53,000 · OtherCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of ChicagoSISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH: $44,500 · OtherSISTERS OF ST. JOSEPHIMMIGRATION LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $44,000 · OtherIMMIGRATION LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTAWAYSIDE HOUSE INC: $38,500 · OtherWAYSIDE HOUSE INCBASILICA OF ST. MARY: $35,000 · OtherBASILICA OF ST. MARYCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $28,100 · OtherCHRIST THE KING CATHOLIC CHURCH: $24,000 · Other+8 more: $93,000 · Other+8 morePROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $72,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR…Peace House Community: $16,000 · Human ServicesPeace House…AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $81,000 · ReligionAGATE HOUS…Bread for the World Institute: $40,000 · InternationalCarmen Pampa Fund: $24,000 · InternationalJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $23,000 · Housing & ShelterNETWORK EDUCATION PROGRAM NETWORK ADVOCATES FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE: $10,000 · Public BenefitTUBMAN: $8,000 · Health
Other$569,600Human Services$88,000Religion$81,000International$64,000Housing & Shelter$23,000Public Benefit$10,000Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC: $81,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC: $72,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $53,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBread for the World Institute: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWAYSIDE HOUSE INC: $38,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCarmen Pampa Fund: $24,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC ELDERCARE: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPeace House Community: $16,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHERESA LIVING CENTER: $12,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNETWORK EDUCATION PROGRAM NETWORK ADVOCATES FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTUBMAN: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Bread for the World Institute ↗
  • Who funds WAYSIDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Carmen Pampa Fund ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC ELDERCARE ↗
  • Who funds Peace House Community ↗
  • Who funds THERESA LIVING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK EDUCATION PROGRAM NETWORK ADVOCATES FOR CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds TUBMAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gilligan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gilligan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $457k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gilligan’s filings →

More from the funding graph