Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gillespie-Notley Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$35kArts & Culture$21kReligion$5kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$2kEmployment$1k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$183k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$10,000
IEEE FOUNDATION$5,000
MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$2,500
HCC FOUNDATION INC$2,500
BARRINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,500
ASBURY FOUNDATION$1,000
MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION & ASSISTANCE FUND: $1k → 9%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $1k → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $500 → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $500 → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $250 → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $250 → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $250 → 8%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 9 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$58k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-22%

Still filing today

56%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +17%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +53%
  • MH
    MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • FE
    FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -22%
  • LC
    LITERACY COUNSIL OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
3
Medical College of Va Foundation

To support and foster vcu health and vcu health sciences through philanthropy, stewardship, innovation, communication, and collaboration.

Education
4
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
6
University of Maryland Family Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
8
University of Maryland Emergency Medicine Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
9
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asbury Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HCC FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · OtherHCC FOUNDATION INCLITERACY COUNCIL OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $5,100 · OtherLITERACY COUNCIL OF MONTGOMERY COUNTYBARRINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4,750 · OtherBARRINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBOWEN MCCAULEY DANCE INC: $2,600 · OtherBOWEN MCCAULEY DANCE INCCHESAPEAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCLITERACY COUNSIL OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $1,000 · Other+2 more: $1,000 · OtherColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $17,500 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundati…MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · EducationMONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATI…IEEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationIEEE FOUNDATION INCMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesFEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE FUND: $1,000 · Human ServicesASBURY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$26,950Arts & Culture$17,500Education$16,000Human Services$4,000Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $17,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIEEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASBURY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IEEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOWEN MCCAULEY DANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERAL EMPLOYEE EDUCATION AND ASSISTANCE FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark-Winchcole FoundationMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gillespie-Notley Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gillespie-Notley Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gillespie-Notley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph