Skip to content
Get It Dun Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Get It Dun Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$214kHealth$109kPhilanthropy$63kRecreation & Sports$41kFood & Nutrition$38kEnvironment$34kHuman Services$15kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$348k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$10,000
SCHOOL OF THE SACRED HEART$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS SAN FRANCISCO$5,000
CHILDREN OF SHELTERS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEAD THE WAY FUND: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
VA
AR
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 9 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
21

Total granted

$395k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

67%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +51%
  • BT
    BATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +159%
  • P2
    PS 234 PARENTS AND TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $22k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +40%
  • BB
    BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -79%
  • CO
    CONVENT OF SACRED HEARTS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
3
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Art of Problem Solving Initiative Inc

Beam aims to open up opportunity for all students at the highest level of achievement, to instill a genuine love for mathematics, and to open up opportunities for fulfilling, well-paid careers. to our knowledge, beam is the only program in…

—
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is N-Star Events Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
10/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOOL OF THE SACRED HEART: $45,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF THE SACRED HEARTJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherJESUIT HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER: $32,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVERBROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $13,000 · OtherBROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY INCChildren of Shelters: $10,000 · OtherCONVENT OF SACRED HEARTS SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherTeam Steady Buckets: $10,000 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank: $7,500 · OtherSCHOOL OF THE SACRED: $7,500 · Other+9 more: $30,000 · Other+9 moreSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL …THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYPS 234 PARENTS AND TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $21,500 · EducationPS 234 PARENTS AND TEA…BAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION USA INC: $5,000 · EducationBATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION: $58,000 · PhilanthropyBATTIER TAKE CH…TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT C…EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyEAT LEARN PLAY …Feeding America: $25,000 · Food & NutritionSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsN-Star Events Inc: $7,500 · Public Benefit
Other$205,500Health$107,500Education$106,500Philanthropy$73,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Recreation & Sports$13,000Public Benefit$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION: $58,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetFeeding America: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPS 234 PARENTS AND TEACHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $21,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetChildren of Shelters: $10,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTeam Steady Buckets: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetN-Star Events Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAD THE WAY FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAHAMAS YOUTH FOUNDATION USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARKYOUTH NYC INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLYMPIC CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Viking Global Foundat…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…The Blackbaud Giving …
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Viking Global Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Get It Dun Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Get It Dun Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Get It Dun’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home