Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George T Pfleger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$775k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$3.7MHealth$836kSocial Science$775kHuman Services$474kInternational$304kEducation$252kCrime & Legal$163kYouth Development$160kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $178k
  • $250k+1 grant · $775k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pfleger Institute$775,000
Lifeline Recovery Services$127,950
Fristers$50,000
Giving Back to Kids$35,000
Hoag Hospital$25,000
First Tee Tri-Valley$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $467k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Fristers: $55k → 10%Fristers: $53k → 10%Fristers: $53k → 10%Fristers: $52k → 10%Fristers: $50k → 10%Fristers: $50k → 10%Fristers: $50k → 10%Fristers: $50k → 10%Be Happy Living Inc: $5k → 10%Fristers: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 13 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$5.5M
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+9%

Still filing today

69%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $938k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthScience & TechRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +71% · 57% of their budget
  • F
    Fristers
    9× · 2017–2025 · $462k · revenue +95%
  • LR
    Lifeline Recovery Services Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $283k · revenue +395% · 80% of their budget

Funded once

  • UR
    UC Regents
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • HM
    HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES
    one grant, 2021 · $45k · revenue -41%
  • 1C
    11-99 CHP Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Resources International Inc
Human Services
2
New Life Recovery Services
Health
3
Global Hmr
4
Preventive Medicine Research Institute

Preventive Medicine Research Institute is a pioneer in scientific research investigating the effects of diet and lifestyle choices on health and disease. Our work is grounded in compassion and dedication to service. PMRI achieves its…

Health
5
Interamerican Behavioral Health Services Inc
6
Semler Institute for Stress Management Research and Education
Health
7
Addiction Recovery Foundation
8
Calvary Relief International Co Cc Sonora
Religion
9
Deeper Life Inc
10
Harm Reduction Therapeutics Inc
Health
11
Worldwide Addiction Recovery Ltd

Addiction recovery literature

Health
12
Life Paradigms Inc
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cri-Help Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research — $3,659,000 · Science & TechPfleger Institute of Environmental ResearchPfleger Institute — $775,000 · OtherPfleger InstituteCRI-HELP INC — $257,000 · OtherCRI-HELP INCHoag Hospital — $250,907 · OtherHoag HospitalUC Regents — $200,000 · OtherUC RegentsLifeline Recovery Services — $127,950 · OtherLifeline Recovery Services+6 more — $129,000 · Other+6 moreFristers — $462,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesLifeline Recovery Services Foundation — $283,192 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $45,000 · HealthGIVING IT BACK TO KIDS INC — $286,740 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $17,000 · ReligionPartners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley — $125,000 · Recreation & SportsOrange County Bar Foundation — $35,000 · Crime & LegalINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Science & Tech$3,659,000Other$1,739,857Human Services$467,000Health$328,192Religion$303,740Recreation & Sports$125,000Crime & Legal$35,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPfleger Institute of Environmental Research — $3,659,000 over 8y, 57% of budgetFristers — $462,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetGIVING IT BACK TO KIDS INC — $286,740 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetLifeline Recovery Services Foundation — $283,192 over 3y, 80% of budgetCRI-HELP INC — $257,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPartners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley — $125,000 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOrange County Bar Foundation — $35,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBEHAPPY LIVING INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research
  • Who funds Fristers
  • Who funds GIVING IT BACK TO KIDS INC
  • Who funds Lifeline Recovery Services Foundation
  • Who funds CRI-HELP INC
  • Who funds Partners Fore Golf Inc The First Tee Tri-Valley
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES
  • Who funds Orange County Bar Foundation
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BEHAPPY LIVING INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George T Pfleger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • International Game Fish Association Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George T Pfleger Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George T Pfleger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph