Skip to content

· Private foundation

George T Lewisjr 2001 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$4.9MFood & Nutrition$1.5MHuman Services$1.0MEmployment$517kEducation$492kPhilanthropy$464kPublic Safety & Disaster$378kYouth Development$331kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.6M
$60,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$200,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL$200,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$150,000
LOWCOUNTY FOOD BANK$105,000
WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK$100,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$100,000
BROOKSTONE SCHOOLS OF MECKLENBURG C$80,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$75,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$75,000
NOURISH UP$75,000
HOPE FOR THE WARRIORS$75,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$65,000
V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$60,000
HOLY ANGELS$55,000
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $396k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $100k → 21%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $60k → 21%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $50k → 21%WESTERN YOUTH NETWORK: $36k → 21%NOURISH UP: $75k → 10%LOAVES AND FISHES: $75k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 29 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
16

Total granted

$9.5M
$918k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+53%

Still filing today

69%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +99%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +106%
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $507k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN - G
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • EC
    ETERNAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $85k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
2
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
3
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
6
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
11
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Angels Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brookes Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $841,750 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $506,750 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATI: $377,850 · OtherSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATIHOLY ANGELS INC: $310,000 · OtherHOLY ANGELS INCYMCA CENTRAL CAROLINAS: $245,000 · OtherYMCA CENTRAL CAROLINASSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $230,000 · OtherCouncil for Childrens Rights Inc: $212,500 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN - G: $200,000 · OtherWILLIAM GUY FORBECK RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $170,000 · Other+21 more: $1,260,450 · Other+21 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,350,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,150,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $236,700 · HealthCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSIONEagle Rock Camp: $116,000 · Health+2 more: $126,700 · HealthHope For The Warriors: $464,000 · PhilanthropyHope For …GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $445,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINI…HIRE HEROES USA INC: $447,900 · EducationHIRE HERO…Brookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County: $370,000 · EducationBrookston…YEAR UP INC: $69,500 · EducationYEAR UP I…HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $440,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $71,200 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionThe Western Youth Network Inc: $246,000 · Human ServicesNourish Up: $150,000 · Human ServicesHOPEFUL HORIZONS: $190,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · ReligionSEA HAVEN INC: $75,650 · Crime & LegalFAMILIES 4 CHANGE: $62,300 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,354,300Health$3,229,400Philanthropy$909,000Education$887,400Food & Nutrition$531,200Human Services$396,000Religion$230,000Crime & Legal$137,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,350,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $506,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHope For The Warriors: $464,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC: $447,900 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $445,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $440,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBrookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County: $370,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetHOLY ANGELS INC: $310,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $250,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Western Youth Network Inc: $246,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $236,700 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCouncil for Childrens Rights Inc: $212,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetHOPEFUL HORIZONS: $190,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWILLIAM GUY FORBECK RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $170,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetNourish Up: $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEagle Rock Camp: $116,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOTHER CAROLINE ACADEMY & EDUCATION CENTER: $96,750 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC: $71,200 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $69,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES 4 CHANGE: $62,300 over 1y, 78% of budgetWAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $26,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKES HAVEN INC: $13,350 over 1y, 45% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope For The Warriors ↗
  • Who funds HIRE HEROES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Brookstone Schools of Mecklenburg County ↗
  • Who funds HOLY ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds The Western Youth Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Council for Childrens Rights Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPEFUL HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM GUY FORBECK RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Up ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Rock Camp ↗
  • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER CAROLINE ACADEMY & EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEA HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES 4 CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds WAMY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George T Lewisjr 2001 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George T Lewisjr 2001 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George T Lewisjr 2001 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George T Lewisjr 2001 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George T Lewisjr 2001’s filings →

More from the funding graph