Skip to content

· Private foundation

George B Kaufman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$73k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of George B Kaufman Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Greater Atlanta Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
2
’18
3
’19
5
’20
6
’21
4
’22
8
’23
5
’24
8
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$522kInternational$201kReligion$45kArts & Culture$37kEducation$21kHealth$14kHuman Services$13kYouth Development$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $73k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$678k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA$72,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ORT$5,000
JELF$2,500
ROBERT B LIPMAN FOUNDATION$2,000
CROHNS & COLITIS$2,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES$2,000
THE WEBER SCHOOL$2,000
ATLANTA BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS$1,000
THE TEMPLE$1,000
NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
DALLAS AREA TORAH ASSOCIATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $2k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $2k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 20 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
11

Total granted

$162k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+14%

Still filing today

20%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +226%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +51%
  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • H
    HADASSAH
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • HJ
    HOUSTON JEWISH FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Joseph Kellman Family Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
The Zuckerman Institute
Education
5
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
6
Feldman Family Foundation
—
7
Feldman Family Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
9
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
11
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
12
Atlanta Association of Legal Administrators Foundation Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Children's Shelter Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Robert B Lipman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $518,300 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $201,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KER…ORT: $33,600 · OtherORTIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant r…BNAI TORAH: $14,928 · OtherBNAI TORAHCROHN'S & COLITIS: $10,000 · OtherCROHN'S & COLITISJELF: $9,660 · OtherJELFATLANTA BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $9,000 · OtherATLANTA BOYS AND G…DALLAS TORAH INSTITUTE: $7,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI INC: $6,800 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SVC: $6,000 · OtherAHAVATH ACHIM SYNAGOGUE: $5,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherTHE EPSTEIN SCHOOL: $5,000 · Other+18 more: $20,820 · Other+18 moreTHE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionOperation Feed Inc: $500 · Food & NutritionNERANENAH INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$520,300International$201,000Other$149,108Education$15,000Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$3,500Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $518,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $201,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNERANENAH INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AKIM USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOODWILL OF NORTH GEORGIA INC: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Feed Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FELICIA PENZELL WEBER JEWISH COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NERANENAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT B LIPMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AKIM USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL OF NORTH GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Feed Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Selig Foundation IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Selig Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George B Kaufman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George B Kaufman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George B Kaufman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph