Skip to content

· Private foundation

George & Sandra Smart Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$350k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$377kReligion$341kCivil Rights$110kHuman Services$54kHealth$47kFood & Nutrition$42kRecreation & Sports$36kArts & Culture$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $297k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Compassion International$161,056
The Chapel Medina$136,000
Compassion Delivered$12,500
Bible Study Fellowship$10,000
Cru$7,400
Pregnancy Choices$5,000
Total Living Center$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Passion City Church$3,500
Columbus Dream Center$2,500
Samaritan's Purse$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Branches Worldwide: $6k → 10%Compassion Delivered: $13k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$970k · 17 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$970k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
+120%

Still filing today

29%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    Total Living Center
    6× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +115%
  • CC
    CUPS CAFE INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $29k · revenue +220%
  • BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $22k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • SN
    STADIA NEW CHURCH STRATEGIES
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • EM
    Ecuador Mission
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • VC
    Various Charities
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Christ for the World Inc

Conducts daily devotional services and sponsors religious projects in developing countries.

Religion
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
5
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
6
Connect the World

The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…

Religion
7
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
8
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
9
Biblica Inc

To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.

Religion
10
Jesus Food

Jesus food is a non-profit organization whose mission is to provide a fully nutritious meal everyday to starving children of all ages around the world. we also believe that by bringing them into a relationship with jesus christ, and…

Religion
11
Christian Life Ministries

Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…

Human Services
12
Angel Christian Television Trust Inc

Our mission is to go into all the world and preach the Gospel through all forms of media and broadcast. We are a Christian organization spreading the word of God to the ends of the earth.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHAPEL MEDINA: $182,250 · OtherTHE CHAPEL MEDINALeaders Edge Safe Harbor: $110,000 · OtherLeaders Edge Safe HarborCHURCH OF THE LAKES: $50,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE LAKESPregnancy Choices: $45,000 · OtherPregnancy ChoicesTotal Living Center: $35,000 · OtherSTADIA NEW CHURCH STRATEGIES: $30,000 · OtherLegacy Project of Stark County: $26,000 · OtherROCK CITY CHURCH: $23,000 · Other+23 more: $164,129 · Other+23 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $353,585 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporate…CUPS CAFE INC: $28,700 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $22,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 · ReligionCompassion Delivered Inc: $12,500 · Human ServicesBRANCHES WORLDWIDE: $6,000 · Human ServicesWhispering Grace Horses: $15,000 · AnimalsFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCAFE OF LIFE INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$665,379International$353,585Religion$53,700Human Services$18,500Animals$15,000Youth Development$5,000Philanthropy$1,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $353,585 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTotal Living Center: $35,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCUPS CAFE INC: $28,700 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWhispering Grace Horses: $15,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetCompassion Delivered Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBRANCHES WORLDWIDE: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE OF LIFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Total Living Center ↗
  • Who funds CUPS CAFE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Whispering Grace Horses ↗
  • Who funds Compassion Delivered Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRANCHES WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAFE OF LIFE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stark Community FoundationOH13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stark Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George & Sandra Smart Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George & Sandra Smart Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to George & Sandra Smart Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to George & Sandra Smart Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George & Sandra Smart Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph