Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George and Marcia Good Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$150kEnvironment$148kHuman Services$104kEducation$72kArts & Culture$70kYouth Development$41kPhilanthropy$2k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PASADENA SENIOR CENTER$61,133
LOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$30,000
VETERANS STRONG USA$15,000
HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL$15,000
THEO ART SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAMORINDA VILLAGE: $13k → 9%BOYS REPUBLIC: $21k → 14%LAMORINDA VILLAGE: $1k → 9%BOYS REPUBLIC: $20k → 14%LAMORINDA VILLAGE: $1k → 9%LAMORINDA VILLAGE: $1k → 9%LAMORINDA VILLAGE: $1k → 9%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $61k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$506k · 8 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$506k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+146%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +148%
  • PH
    Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd
    4× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue +25%
  • PS
    PASADENA SENIOR CENTER
    2× · 2021–2025 · $87k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • YH
    YOUNG & HEALTHYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +146%
  • UP
    USC PACIFIC ASIA MUSEUM
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Active San Gabriel Valley

Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV) is a community-based environmental advocacy and public health non-profit organization. Our mission is to promote a more sustainable, equitable, and livable San Gabriel Valley.

Community Improvement
2
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
3
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

4
Greater Los Angeles Veterans Research and Education Foundation

Building partnerships to advance research and education for the health of our nation's veterans.

Health
5
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
6
Pasadena Community Foundation

Pasadena Community Foundation builds and preserves permanently endowed charitable funds, provides grants and assistance to nurture and strengthen community organizations, serves donors to meet their philanthropic goals and promotes and…

Philanthropy
7
Senior Access

Senior Access's mission is to help Marin's older and disabled adults remain independent and part of the community for as long as possible.

8
Arlington Garden in Pasadena

Arlington Garden is a climate-appropriate, habitat garden offering learning, inspiration, and enjoyment for all.

Environment
9
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
10
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
11
Altadena Builds Back Foundation

To help lead and fund Altadena's community-centered recovery, ensuring a just, equitable rebuilding process that prioritizes housing and those most affected by the Eaton Fire.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Livingston Memorial Visiting Nurse Association

Livingston provides a variety of home health services ranging from rehabilitative care to hospice care of the highest quality in the most cost-effective manner to residents of ventura county.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy and the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDATION INC — $147,500 · EnvironmentLOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDA…PASADENA SENIOR CENTER — $86,517 · Human ServicesPASADENA SENIOR CENTERBoys Republic — $40,624 · Human ServicesBoys RepublicLAMORINDA VILLAGE INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesLAMORINDA VILLAGE INCPasadena Hospital Association Ltd — $115,000 · HealthPasadena Hospital Associat…YOUNG & HEALTHY — $20,000 · HealthYOUNG & HEALTHYHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $60,000 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HUN…Individual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherUSC PACIFIC ASIA MUSEUM — $10,000 · OtherTHEO ART SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation — $36,841 · EducationVeteran Strong USA — $15,000 · Public BenefitSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $2,450 · Philanthropy
Environment$147,500Human Services$144,141Health$135,000Arts & Culture$60,000Other$45,000Education$36,841Public Benefit$15,000Philanthropy$2,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOS ANGELES ARBORETUM FOUNDATION INC — $147,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd — $115,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA SENIOR CENTER — $86,517 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Republic — $40,624 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSentinels of Freedom Scholarship Foundation — $36,841 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG & HEALTHY — $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLAMORINDA VILLAGE INC — $17,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVeteran Strong USA — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $2,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George and Marcia Good Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph