Skip to content

· Private foundation

Geomar Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$419k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$430kInternational$321kEducation$306kHealth$276kEnvironment$205kArts & Culture$165kCivil Rights$147kHuman Services$135kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $71k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA$110,000
BAR HARBOR MUSIC FESTIVAL$25,000
PENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$20,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY FOOD BANK$20,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UDAR$20,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$15,000
PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION$15,000
SOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN$12,500
ANDERSON VALLEY FOOD BANK$10,000
RAPHAEL HOUSE$10,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL$10,000
NATURE IN THE CITY$10,000
ANDERSON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
BROOKE USA$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMENS WAY: $5k → 22%WOMANS WAY: $5k → 22%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ANDERSON VALLEY SR CITIZENS CTR: $5k → 18%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $110k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $15k → 14%World Food Program: $10k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $10k → 14%ANDERSON VALLEY SR CITIZEN'S CTR: $5k → 18%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 10%Raphael House: $10k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 10%RAPHAEL HOUSE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
WY
PA
CA
CO
KY
MD
KS
DC
LA
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 56 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
26

Total granted

$1.9M
$383k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+44%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $145k · revenue +4%
  • PC
    PENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +18%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • ST
    SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +47%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -1%
  • RI
    RENO INITIATIVE FOR SHELTER
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Committee Children's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bar Harbor Music Festival: $150,000 · OtherBar Harbor Music FestivalDream Project: $122,077 · OtherDream ProjectALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $110,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $100,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA: $60,000 · OtherNature in the City: $45,000 · Other+58 more: $642,500 · Other+58 morePENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $115,000 · HealthPENINSULA COM…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $61,205 · HealthPARTNERS IN H…BONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthBONE MARROW &…Manes for Movement Inc: $45,000 · HealthManes for Mov…+3 more: $15,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF TH…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S C…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesWOMENS WAY: $10,000 · Human ServicesANDERSON VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC: $75,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $45,000 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $25,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalJustWorld International Inc: $110,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE: $10,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationCareer Girls: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $4,000 · EducationSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $100,000 · EnvironmentSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentAnderson Valley Education Foundation: $45,000 · PhilanthropyPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION: $19,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MENDOCINO COUNTY: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,229,577Health$286,205Human Services$282,500International$180,000Education$149,000Environment$125,000Philanthropy$74,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $145,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $115,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJustWorld International Inc: $110,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $61,205 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetManes for Movement Inc: $45,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetAnderson Valley Education Foundation: $45,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetABUNDANT WATERS INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MENDOCINO COUNTY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS WAY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEL CAMINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE District Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetANDERSON VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaby Quest Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN'S LEAGUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE RENO INITIATIVE FOR SHELTER AND EQUALITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSICIANS ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOW INCOME HOUSING INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds JustWorld International Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds BONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Manes for Movement Inc ↗
  • Who funds Anderson Valley Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA17.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Geomar Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geomar Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Geomar Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Geomar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Geomar’s filings →

More from the funding graph