Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gennx Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$333kHealth$233kEducation$202kCommunity Improvement$126kArts & Culture$93kScience & Tech$75kPhilanthropy$70kPublic Benefit$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k41 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $151k
$1,500
Median grant
22
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILY$41,000
PROJECT SUNSHINE$25,000
PATH TO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$23,000
MENTAL HEALTH COALITION$15,000
NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION$15,000
NASP$12,000
VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM$10,000
LSA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES$10,000
SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND$7,500
PRINCETON INTERNATIONAL$6,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$5,000
BEAVER DAM YOUTH GIRLS 3PT CLUB$4,500
ABRAHAMINMOTION INC$2,500
SFC VIRGINIA$2,250
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO$2,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $295k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING AND REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $2k → 11%HOSPICE OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD: $200 → 8%WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $250 → 12%FORESTDALE INC: $5k → 13%BUDDY'S SECOND CHANCE RESCUE: $250 → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 → 14%MUST MINISTRIES: $4k → 8%FRANCISCAN CENTER OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 19%FAIR CHANCE: $5k → 14%ABRAHAMINMOTION INC: $3k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $35k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $24k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $10k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $4k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250 → 14%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $4k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $4k → 17%NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION: $15k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMENS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM: $10k → 17%VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM INC: $3k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN: $55k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILY: $41k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 32% of Gennx Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 56% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 39% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Gennx Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$691k · 29 repeat orgs$750k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
131

Total granted

$691k
$684k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+5%

Still filing today

83%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue +124%
  • PT
    PATH TO COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $70k · revenue +22%
  • THE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    3× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -28%
  • TC
    THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
9
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Assumption Family Health Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ukrainians of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Addiction Recovery ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Social ServicesSchool District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%6%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr14%13%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/126
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,634

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 199 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/118
Grantees still filing
71/118
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LITTLE SISTERS OF ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES — $57,083 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICESTHE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $50,000 · OtherTHE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES INC — $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES INCLINDA HARPER FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherLINDA HARPER FOUNDATIONA BETTER CHANCE INC — $28,500 · OtherTHE LINKS INC — $25,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · Other+119 more — $363,916 · Other+119 moreTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $242,210 · Human ServicesTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPA…NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDA…Violence Intervention Program — $12,500 · Human Services+13 more — $20,800 · Human Services+13 morePATH TO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $70,000 · EducationPATH TO COLL…THE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC — $50,000 · EducationTHE NATIONAL…THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $10,500 · EducationTHE HOWARD U…Piney Woods School — $10,000 · EducationPiney Woods …+12 more — $17,150 · Education+12 morePROJECT SUNSHINE INC — $40,000 · HealthPROJECT S…NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $25,000 · HealthNEW YORK-…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $17,750 · HealthST JUDE C…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $7,500 · HealthSEMPER FI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 · HealthALZHEIMER…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $6,775 · HealthMEMORIAL …+17 more — $21,375 · Health+17 moreTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG AUDIENCES INC — $16,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG AUDIENCES NEW YORK INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureWNET — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ROBERT RUSSA MOTON MUSEUM INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $2,750 · Arts & CultureBETA IOTA BOULE FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyMental Health Coalition Inc — $25,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Philanthropy+5 more — $5,250 · PhilanthropyHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementNational Association of Securities Professionals — $17,000 · Community Improvement
Other$674,499Human Services$295,510Education$157,650Health$125,900Arts & Culture$88,750Philanthropy$72,750Community Improvement$37,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $242,210 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPATH TO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetTHE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE INC — $28,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LINKS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health Coalition Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $17,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNational Association of Securities Professionals — $17,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetViolence Intervention Program — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES NEW YORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SERAPHIC SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPiney Woods School — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $6,775 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWNET — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR CHANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROBERT RUSSA MOTON MUSEUM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetROBERT A TOIGO FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORESTDALE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMust Ministries Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEWIN Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetThe Eagle Academy Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY AFRICAN DIASPORAN ARTS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSFC VIRGINIA — $2,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILLIAMS-FRANKLIN FOUNDATION — $2,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENDALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $1,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationThe Hyde and Watson F…Pinkerton FoundationThe Rockefeller Found…United Way of New Yor…Annie E Casey Foundat…American Express Foun…The Ayco Charitable F…Brooklyn Community Fo…United Way Miami IncThe Ford FoundationThe Lazard Charitable…
Robin Hood FoundationNY17.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · United Way of New York City · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · American Express Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · United Way Miami Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Lazard Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gennx Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Hospice of Martha's Vineyard Inc Dba Hospice and Palliative Care of Martha's — 5% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • The Renaissance Learning Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gennx Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gennx Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 199 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines