· Public charity
Generations United Inc
To improve the lives of children, youth and older people through intergenerational collaboration, public policies and programs for the enduring benefit for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILD TRENDS | $200,605 |
| NATIONAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ASSOCIATION | $168,989 |
| USAGING | $148,688 |
| NATIONAL CAUCUS AND CENTER ON BLACK AGING | $103,813 |
| ZERO TO THREE | $99,318 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NINATIONAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ASSOCIATION7× · 2019–2025 · $782k · revenue +38%
- UUSAGING4× · 2022–2025 · $725k · revenue +152%
- NCNATIONAL CAUCUS AND CENTER ON BLACK AGING INC4× · 2022–2025 · $425k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- GRGRANDPARENTS RAISING GRAND CHILDREN INFORMATION CENTER OF LAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue +157%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INCone grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue +22%
- FEFAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.
Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.
Providing resources & services to vulnerable children and families to address overall well-being. family impact network ("fin") supports restorative and empowering efforts to transition under-resourced children and families from crisis to…
We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.
Child care aware of washington provides thorough and independent information and support for families seeking quality child care, for child care programs seeking to improve quality, and for effective policy making.
Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.
Guardianship services, inc. (gsi) answers the call to protect tarrant county's vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect and exploitation with services ranging from guardianship to money management, victim advocacy and financial literacy…
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
Childstrive builds on the relationships, strengths, and unique abilities of young children and their families by fostering social, emotional, and physical well-being so all children can flourish.
The mission of the organization is to strengthen youth and families through high quality prevention, support, and transition services.
To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Trends Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grandparents Raising Grand Children Information Center of La. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD TRENDS INC ↗
- Who funds USAGING ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CAUCUS AND CENTER ON BLACK AGING INC ↗
- Who funds ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds DETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds GRANDPARENTS RAISING GRAND CHILDREN INFORMATION CENTER OF LA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY EDUCATION & SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEADINGAGE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds YPSILANTI SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Bar Association ↗
- Who funds Food Research & Action Center ↗
- Who funds FOSTER KINSHIP ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO SECOND CHANCE PROGRAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Generations United Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
- The Children's Home Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Indian Child Welfare Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.