Skip to content
Gavi Alliance at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

$2.9B
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$88M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$467MHealth$77MEducation$18MScience & Tech$8.7MCommunity Improvement$5.6MPhilanthropy$750kSocial Science$266kEnvironment$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 39 grants below total $151,169,405, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,912,788,961 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,761,619,556 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+26 grants · $150M
$521,195
Median grant
15
States reached
$9.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNICEF$87,688,260
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE$12,569,078
JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC$10,024,296
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$5,549,120
PATH$4,785,426
CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL FOUNDATION$4,762,977
THE WORLD BANK (IBRD)$2,778,000
RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE$2,550,948
CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS (THROUGH GLOBAL HEALTH ADVOCACY INCUBATOR)$2,450,677
VILLAGE REACH$2,441,687
ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC$2,183,933
NEXLEAF ANALYTICS$1,623,092
PAN AMERICAN SANITARY BUREAU$1,617,453
GDI SOLUTIONS LLC$1,489,134
INTEGRATE HEALTH INC$1,487,180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $639k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $639k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.8B on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.6B · 58% · 85 grants

Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

South Asia$498M · 18% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES · WORK PLAN

Various Regions$239M · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$173M · 6% · 41 grants

Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

East Asia and the Pacific$111M · 4% · 22 grants

Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

Middle East and North Africa$92M · 3% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: WORK PLAN · COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

Central America and the Caribbean$24M · 1% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

Russia and Neighboring States$20M · 1% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

South America$11M · 0% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: COUNTRY PROGRAMMES · WORK PLAN

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$551M · 33 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$551M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+59%

Still filing today

58%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    5× · 2020–2024 · $361M · revenue +46%
  • CH
    CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $28M · revenue +24%
  • JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $28M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WORLD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $7.4M
  • TT
    THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $639k · revenue +94%
  • KL
    KARNA LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $491k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
3
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
4
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
5
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
6
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
7
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
10
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
11
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eleanor Crook Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $360,993,132 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $28,481,017 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INCPATH: $15,354,092 · International+5 more: $13,332,747 · InternationalJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $28,443,907 · OtherJSI RESEARCH & TRAI…INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT: $20,632,698 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BANK …PAN AMERICAN SANITARY BUREAU: $12,405,432 · OtherPAN AMERICAN SANITA…THE WORLD BANK (IBRD): $7,361,004 · OtherTHE WORLD BANK (IBR…CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION: $4,903,489 · OtherZENYSIS TECHNOLOGIES: $4,295,917 · OtherZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC: $3,733,933 · OtherJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $3,387,871 · Other+28 more: $15,382,583 · Other+28 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10,467,308 · EducationVILLAGEREACH: $9,150,633 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,075,948 · EducationYale University: $1,765,497 · Education+4 more: $1,230,663 · EducationNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $17,774,848 · Arts & CultureNEXLEAF ANALYTICS: $4,779,884 · HealthCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $3,104,782 · HealthIntegrate Health Inc: $1,987,218 · HealthELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $521,195 · Health+1 more: $306,642 · HealthGDI-SOLUTIONS INC: $2,352,978 · PhilanthropyELEANOR CROOK FOUNDATION: $750,000 · PhilanthropyResearch Triangle Institute: $791,914 · Science & Tech
International$418,160,988Other$100,546,834Education$25,690,049Arts & Culture$17,774,848Health$10,699,721Philanthropy$3,102,978Science & Tech$791,914

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $360,993,132 over 5y, 12% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $28,481,017 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetJSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $28,443,907 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $17,774,848 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetPATH: $15,354,092 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10,467,308 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $9,150,633 over 5y, 15% of budgetGlobal Impact: $6,000,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $5,831,679 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetNEXLEAF ANALYTICS: $4,779,884 over 5y, 34% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION: $3,387,871 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS: $3,104,782 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,075,948 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGDI-SOLUTIONS INC: $2,352,978 over 2y, 81% of budgetIntegrate Health Inc: $1,987,218 over 2y, 10% of budgetYale University: $1,765,497 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc: $1,673,051 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUS ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: $1,015,862 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetKhushi Baby Inc: $950,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $791,914 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $776,054 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetELEANOR CROOK FOUNDATION: $750,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTHE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $639,452 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $543,005 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $521,195 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $402,746 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $358,598 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHAROS GLOBAL HEALTH ADVISORS LTD: $306,642 over 1y, 23% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $272,299 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $266,465 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University: $197,020 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGEREACH ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXLEAF ANALYTICS ↗
  • Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR TOBACCO-FREE KIDS ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds GDI-SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Integrate Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Albert B Sabin Vaccine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds US ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION ↗
  • Who funds Khushi Baby Inc ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ELEANOR CROOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationPathJsi Research & Traini…The Patrick J McGover…Johns Hopkins Univers…The Rockefeller Found…Jhpiego CorporationVital Strategies IncGood Ventures Foundat…The Skoll FoundationTrustees of Boston Un…Silicon Valley Commun…
Gates FoundationWA33× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Path · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The Patrick J McGovern Foundation Inc · Johns Hopkins University · The Rockefeller Foundation · Jhpiego Corporation · Vital Strategies Inc · Good Ventures Foundation · The Skoll Foundation · Trustees of Boston University · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gavi Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gavi Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Jhpiego Corporation: 65% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gavi Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home