Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gates Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36M
Granted FY2025still arriving
374
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$20M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$90MSocial Science$40MEnvironment$18MHealth$7.2MArts & Culture$6.7MCommunity Improvement$6.2MHuman Services$3.7MHousing & Shelter$3.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 374 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $206k
  • $10k–50k231 grants · $5.6M
  • $50k–250k91 grants · $6.7M
  • $250k+7 grants · $24M
$25,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$424M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$20,000,000
CARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL$2,000,000
LYRA$550,000
ROOTED$400,000
ROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$383,333
COLORADO SCHOOLS FUND$300,000
RIVER NETWORK$250,000
RIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TR A COL$200,000
ELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$200,000
COLORADO WATER TRUST INC$200,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO$150,000
WILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION I$150,000
CONSERVATION COLORADO EDUCATION FUN$150,000
NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATI$150,000
AMERICA SUCCEEDS$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELLSPRING COMMUNITY: $25k → 3%LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY: $30k → 6%GRASSROOTS FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 13%COMMUNITY OF CARING FOUNDATION: $40k → 8%HOLYOKE COMMUNITY CHILDCARE INITIAT: $25k → 11%First Southwest Community Fund: $50k → 17%SPANISH PEAKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $40k → 19%Npx Charitable Inc: $50k → 10%COMMUNITY OF CARING FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%Kindred Kids Child Advocacy Center Inc: $35k → 17%FIRST SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FUND: $50k → 17%NPX Charitable Inc: $25k → 10%FIRST SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY FUND: $50k → 17%Npx Charitable Inc: $25k → 10%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES OF FRE: $25k → 17%SOLID ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $75k → 9%START UP COLORADO: $40k → 12%STARTUP COLORADO: $35k → 12%ERIK HITE FOUNDATION: $55k → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $50k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HAWAII: $30k → 9%BRIDGE HOUSE: $40k → 12%Mi Casa Resource Center: $30k → 12%ERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 15%PROJECT WORTHMORE: $40k → 8%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $50k → 15%VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER: $35k → 8%ERIK HITE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 15%STARTUP COLORADO: $55k → 11%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $40k → 15%STARTUP COLORADO: $35k → 11%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN INC: $35k → 15%WEECYCLE: $50k → 8%SECOND CHANCE CENTER: $70k → 10%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $50k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $50k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $40k → 12%STRUGGLE OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%Adoption Exchange (The): $30k → 8%PCS FOR PEOPLE: $40k → 12%Family Resource Center Association Inc: $45k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO I: $30k → 12%ADVANCE INC: $35k → 12%DENVER INDIAN HEALTH AND FAMILY SER: $75k → 12%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $50k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $65k → 12%Healthy Childcare Colorado: $100k → 12%THRIVING FAMILIES: $35k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$171M · 356 repeat orgs$24M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

356 repeat relationships: 208 still active in FY2025, 148 since wound down; 112 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

356
481

Total granted

$171M
$20M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+8%

Still filing today

78%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13M · revenue +22%
  • CM
    CARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7.3M · revenue +75%
  • TT
    The Thacher School Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4.3M · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • GC
    Gates Center for Regenerative Medicine
    one grant, 2020 · $2.3M
  • GG
    Gates Grubstake Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $1.2M
  • TC
    THE COLORADO PREVENTION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
2
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
3
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
4
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
5
Colorado Agricultural Leadership Program

To develop leaders that will become a strong, unified voice for agricultural issues.

Education
6
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
7
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
8
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
9
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
10
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
11
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
12
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Gates Biomanufacturing Facility Sup Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

678 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 678 of the 974 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

30
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
172
Early backer (in before they grew)
665/678
Grantees still filing
422/678
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $44,620,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $12,925,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERCARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $7,250,000 · EducationCARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOLThe Thacher School Inc: $4,250,000 · EducationLYRA: $2,892,500 · Education+39 more: $10,943,589 · Education+39 moreGATES INSTITUTE: $39,780,000 · OtherGATES INSTITUTEGates Center for Regenerative Medicine: $2,322,745 · Other+96 more: $25,172,038 · Other+96 moreRIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $2,515,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO COALITION OF LAND TRUSTS: $695,000 · EnvironmentMONTEZUMA LAND CONSERVANCY: $591,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $535,000 · EnvironmentCOLORADO WATER TRUST: $380,466 · EnvironmentWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $380,000 · EnvironmentKEYSTONE CENTER: $360,000 · EnvironmentWATER FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Environment+17 more: $2,810,000 · EnvironmentWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $3,450,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $1,155,707 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $634,754 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $270,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $190,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICA SUCCEEDS: $690,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $660,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS: $462,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $363,965 · Arts & CultureArtspace Projects Inc: $325,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER CIVIC ARTS FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Arts & CultureRANCHO LOS CERRITOS FOUNDATION: $185,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $175,000 · Arts & CultureTREAD OF PIONEERS HISTORICAL COMMISSION: $155,000 · Arts & CultureLatino Leadership Institute: $150,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $525,000 · Arts & CultureRose Community Foundation: $1,636,105 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO SCHOOLS FUND: $550,000 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $315,000 · PhilanthropyLONG BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $307,500 · PhilanthropyTHE DENVER FOUNDATION: $230,000 · PhilanthropyBARTON INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $125,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $101,704 · PhilanthropyChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $2,250,000 · HealthTHE COLORADO PREVENTION CENTER: $500,000 · HealthDUEKER RANCH INC: $150,000 · HealthSOCIETY OF METABOLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS INC: $149,000 · Health+1 more: $100,000 · Health
Education$82,881,089Other$67,274,783Environment$8,566,466Recreation & Sports$5,700,461Arts & Culture$3,890,965Philanthropy$3,265,309Health$3,149,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $44,620,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $12,925,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL: $7,250,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc: $4,250,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $3,450,000 over 6y, 44% of budgetLYRA: $2,892,500 over 6y, 100% of budgetROOTED: $2,590,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetRIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST: $2,515,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $2,250,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $1,700,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetRose Community Foundation: $1,636,105 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetAurora Public Schools Foundation: $1,250,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION: $1,155,707 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $952,074 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGATES BIOMANUFACTURING FACILITY SUP FOUNDATION: $925,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetBICYCLE COLORADO: $745,000 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $700,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCOLORADO COALITION OF LAND TRUSTS: $695,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetAMERICA SUCCEEDS: $690,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $660,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $650,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LAND CONSERVANCY: $640,246 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $634,754 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMONTEZUMA LAND CONSERVANCY: $591,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetCOLORADO SCHOOLS FUND: $550,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $535,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO PREVENTION CENTER: $500,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY WEALTH BUILDING: $490,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS: $462,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUILDERS: $435,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetCOLORADO WATER TRUST: $380,466 over 3y, 12% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $380,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetMontbello Organizing Committee: $375,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCOLORADO LEAGUE OF CHARTER SCHOOLS: $365,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $363,965 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetKEYSTONE CENTER: $360,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN: $350,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetMoonshot edVentures: $340,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetArtspace Projects Inc: $325,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCIVIC NEWS COMPANY: $325,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $320,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $315,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLONG BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $307,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $305,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRISE COLORADO: $298,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetLONG BEACH STATE FOUNDATION: $290,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $270,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds CARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Thacher School Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LYRA ↗
  • Who funds ROOTED ↗
  • Who funds RIO GRANDE HEADWATERS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATION COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Aurora Public Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Gates Grubstake Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GATES BIOMANUFACTURING FACILITY SUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BICYCLE COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO COALITION OF LAND TRUSTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA SUCCEEDS ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTEZUMA LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SCHOOLS FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO PREVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY WEALTH BUILDING ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO WATER TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO154.8× affinity201 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Kenneth Kendal King Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Colorado Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gates Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gates Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
79report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gates Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gates Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 974 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gates Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph