Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gamez Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$84kHuman Services$77kAnimals$57kInternational$15kFood & Nutrition$15kEnvironment$10kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Denver Zoological Foundation Inc$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Domino Service Dog$5,000
Garden of the Gods Foundation$5,000
The Lady Bug Fund$5,000
Colorado Fourteeners Initiative$5,000
International Hearing Dog Inc$5,000
Volunteers For Outdoor Colorado$5,000
The Wild Animal Sanctuary$5,000
Aftersight$4,021
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Wounded Warrior Project: $29k → 14%International Hearing Dog Inc: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$97k · 4 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -34% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$97k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
-34%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $34k · revenue +34%
  • EW
    ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +98%
  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SENIOR HUB INC
    one grant, 2023 · $29k · revenue +94%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $17k
  • AC
    Archbishops Catholic Appeal
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Open Sanctuary Project Inc

The Open Sanctuary Project is a freely accessible, always growing digital guide for any resources or information you need in order to responsibly create and successfully manage an animal sanctuary or to provide the best possible care to…

Animals
3
Poudre Wilderness Volunteers

Poudre Wilderness Volunteers (PWV) is a Larimer County, Colorado, nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1996. The mission of PWV is to assist the Canyon Lakes Ranger District of the United States Forest Service in managing and…

Environment
4
Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wildernesses

The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…

Environment
5
New Mexico Wildlife Center Inc

New mexico wildlife center's mission is to protect new mexico's wildlife through rehabilitation, conservation, education, and public engagement.

6
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
7
Environmental and Animal Defense

At Environmental and Animal Defense, our mission is to provide Colorado with access to affordable legal services for environmental and animal issues, in addition to protecting wildlife and their habitats through enforcement of the law. No…

Crime & Legal
8
Ark-Valley Humane Society Inc

Ark-Valley Humane Society's (AVHS) Mission is ensuring the welfare of companion animals through compassion and care. AVHS operated an open-admission animal shelter for Chaffee County, Colorado.

Animals
9
Colorado Pet Pantry

The organization temporarily feeds colorado pets, allowing families to increase their ability to care for pets with the goal of keeping them out of shelters and with their families.

Animals
10
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
11
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
12
Working Dogs for Conservation Found

Partner with detection dogs to further conservation initiatives around the world. Working Dogs for Conservation Foundation (WD4C) integrates scientific-detection dog teams with established management and conservation efforts to address…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adams County Emergency Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SENIOR HUB INC — $29,000 · OtherTHE SENIOR HUB INCHoly Ghost Catholic Church — $24,000 · OtherHoly Ghost Catholic ChurchIndividual grant recipient — $16,808 · OtherIndividual grant recipientArchbishops Catholic Appeal — $15,000 · OtherArchbishops Catholic AppealSt Augustine Catholic Church — $10,000 · OtherSt Augustine Catholic ChurchIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC PARISH — $8,825 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC PARISHTHE LADYBUG FUND INC — $5,000 · OtherDomino Service Dog — $5,000 · OtherSt Vincent de Paul Catholic Church — $5,000 · OtherGarden of the Gods Foundation — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $5,021 · OtherDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · AnimalsDENVER ZOOLOGICAL F…THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $19,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIMAL SAN…OLD DOGS NEW DIGS — $8,000 · AnimalsOLD DOGS NEW DIGSWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR…PARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $5,000 · Human ServicesPARAGON SERVICE…ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $19,730 · ReligionADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $14,750 · Food & NutritionCOLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsVOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED — $9,006 · Health
Other$138,654Animals$47,000Human Services$39,000Religion$19,730Food & Nutrition$14,750Recreation & Sports$10,000Health$9,006

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $34,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $19,730 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $14,750 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED — $9,006 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLD DOGS NEW DIGS — $8,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetPARAGON SERVICE DOGS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGarden of the Gods Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEERS FOR OUTDOOR COLORADO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gamez Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph