· Private foundation
Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| the americas grow-a-row | $30,000 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $30,000 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE | $10,000 |
| SAFE SOUND SOMERSET | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Americas Grow-A-Row8× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +205%- AUAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $38k · revenue +51%
- CCCHRYSALIS CENTER INC2× · 2019–2020 · $14k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSEone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- BABELOVED ASHEVILLEone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- MWMOUNTAIN WAYS INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the lives and health of people with hiv/aids, cancer, and other serious illnesses by preparing and delivering (free of charge) specialized meals and groceries, providing nutritional counseling, and reducing social isolation.
Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.
Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…
To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.
The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.
Provide healthy calories, strengthen community and improve the urban environment through a nationwide network of sustainable little orchards to dramatically increase access to healthy food.
Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible
The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.
To provide comprehensive support services for individuals and families that are in need of everyday necessities due to insufficient financial resources or family instabilty. c.a.r.e.s. will offer food, clothing, job education and training…
To provide safe, habitable housing for families with low to moderate incomes, including homeless families, and to develop mixed income housing to help low income families in the transition to self-sufficiency while providing comprehensive…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Good Charities and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Americas Grow-A-Row ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN WAYS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARK-ALS INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds SOURLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GIFTS OF LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds GARDNERS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WE MAKE AUTISM AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GREENBELT LAND TRUST OF MID MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds IEP Youth Services Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
- Who funds FARMINGTON RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chrysalis Center Inc — 93% of income from government
- Farmington River Watershed Association Inc — 69% of income from government
- The Bridge Family Center Inc — 61% of income from government
- Iep Youth Services Inc — 50% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- New Horizons Inc — 4% of income from government
- Neighbors in Need Inc — 3% of income from government
- We Make Autism at Work Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Center School — 0% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley?
Find your warmest path to Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.