Skip to content
Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley at a glance

· Private foundation

Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$204kHuman Services$122kHealth$112kEducation$99kEnvironment$85kInternational$65kYouth Development$33kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEAM RUBICON$30,000
the americas grow-a-row$30,000
SAFE SOUND SOMERSET$10,000
ST JUDE$10,000
TEAM RUBICON$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IEP YOUTH SERVICES INC: $8k → 6%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $4k → 7%MERCY CHEFS: $5k → 20%the americas grow-a-row: $36k → 4%the americas grow-a-row: $30k → 4%HARK ALS: $8k → 5%NEW HORIZONS INC: $25k → 11%the americas grow-a-row: $30k → 4%NEW HORIZONS INC: $16k → 11%the americas grow-a-row: $23k → 4%HARK ALS: $5k → 5%the americas grow-a-row: $22k → 4%GIFTS OF LOVE: $10k → 11%the americas grow-a-row: $18k → 4%the americas grow-a-row: $15k → 4%the americas grow-a-row: $10k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$404k · 8 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
42

Total granted

$404k
$345k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Americas Grow-A-Row
    8× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +205%
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $38k · revenue +51%
  • CC
    CHRYSALIS CENTER INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $14k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • MW
    MOUNTAIN WAYS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -93%
  • BA
    BELOVED ASHEVILLE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Friends Inc

To improve the lives and health of people with hiv/aids, cancer, and other serious illnesses by preparing and delivering (free of charge) specialized meals and groceries, providing nutritional counseling, and reducing social isolation.

Health
2
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
4
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
6
The Giving Grove

Provide healthy calories, strengthen community and improve the urban environment through a nationwide network of sustainable little orchards to dramatically increase access to healthy food.

Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding Avery Families Inc

Provide food at no cost to hungry people in need in avery county, nc and improve their health where possible

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding the Carolinas

The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
10
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
11
Cares of Farmington Hills Inc

To provide comprehensive support services for individuals and families that are in need of everyday necessities due to insufficient financial resources or family instabilty. c.a.r.e.s. will offer food, clothing, job education and training…

Food & Nutrition
12
Archway Housing & Services

To provide safe, habitable housing for families with low to moderate incomes, including homeless families, and to develop mixed income housing to help low income families in the transition to self-sufficiency while providing comprehensive…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Good Charities; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Americas Grow-A-Row: $183,210 · Human ServicesAmericas Grow-A-RowNEW HORIZONS INC: $40,980 · Human ServicesNEW HORIZONS INCHARK-ALS INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $10,335 · Human Services+4 more: $21,150 · Human Services+4 moreST JUDE: $70,000 · OtherST JUDEIndividual grant recipient: $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRYSALIS CENTER INC: $13,833 · OtherTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $13,832 · OtherSOURLAND CONSERVANCY: $12,500 · OtherNEIGHBORS IN NEED INC: $12,500 · Other+29 more: $190,637 · Other+29 moreAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $38,000 · EducationAUBURN UNI…THE CENTER SCHOOL: $17,000 · EducationTHE CENTER…University of South Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationUniversity…CARMEL CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationCARMEL CON…+1 more: $500 · EducationTEAM RUBICON INC: $40,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMOUNTAIN WAYS INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 · Religion
Human Services$268,675Other$344,302Education$70,500Public Safety & Disaster$40,000Youth Development$25,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmericas Grow-A-Row: $183,210 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetNEW HORIZONS INC: $40,980 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN WAYS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER SCHOOL: $17,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER INC: $13,833 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FAMILY CENTER INC: $13,832 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARK-ALS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetNEIGHBORS IN NEED INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSOURLAND CONSERVANCY: $12,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $10,335 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWE MAKE AUTISM AT WORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENBELT LAND TRUST OF MID MISSOURI INC: $7,500 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetIEP Youth Services Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFARMINGTON RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCARMEL CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $3,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $2,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation f…Farmington Bank Commu…Thomaston Savings Ban…Ion Bank Foundation I…Aetna Foundation IncBristol-Myers Squibb …The Robert Wood Johns…Chubb Charitable Foun…Verizon FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…
Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Chrysalis Center Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Farmington River Watershed Association Inc: 69% of income from government
  • The Bridge Family Center Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Iep Youth Services Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • New Horizons Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Neighbors in Need Inc: 3% of income from government
  • We Make Autism at Work Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Center School: 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley?

Find your warmest path to Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gackstatter Foundation Inc Co Renate Maley’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home