Skip to content
G & G Outreach Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

G & G Outreach Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$143kEducation$33kHealth$25kInternational$23kYouth Development$23kHuman Services$20kCivil Rights$17kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASONE MINISTRY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$2,500
BUS STOP MINISTRY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIVING WATERS INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 8%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $5k → 6%ASONE MINISTRIES: $10k → 5%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $5k → 6%CONFLUENCE MINISTRIES: $15k → 12%CONFLUENCE MINISTRIES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
SD
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$202k · 24 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
24

Total granted

$202k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k · revenue +76%
  • CM
    CONFLUENCE MINISTRIES
    2× · 2018–2023 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • II
    INVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $10k · revenue +267%

Funded once

  • CC
    Colorado Christian University
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +3%
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • DA
    Denver Area Youth For Christ Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Colorado Baptist General Convention

Mission Church to tell the Gospel of Jesus Christ to those who dont know.

—
3
Discovery Christian Church of Colorado

Make disciples of Jesus that make new disciples

Religion
4
Encounter Church

Church

Religion
5
The Denver Institute

To prepare people to serve God and others in their daily work so that workplaces and cities are transformed.

Religion
6
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
7
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
8
Dm Multiplied Inc

Training church leaders in the entire world, with a special focus on training young adults for a lifetime of service.

Religion
9
Disciple Maker Ministries

Disciple Maker Ministries is devoted to fulfilling the Great Commission through evangelism and reproducing discipleship.

Religion
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
12
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is March for Life Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUMMIT MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · OtherSUMMIT MINISTRIES INCIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWELLSPRING CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherWELLSPRING CHURCHCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $15,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTHEART TRANSFORMATION: $15,000 · OtherHEART TRANSFORMATIONTHE CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIONAL DISCIPLESHIP: $10,000 · OtherPRISON FELLOWSHIP: $10,000 · OtherTHE DENVER STREET SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherEMBRACE MERCY: $10,000 · Other+27 more: $74,500 · Other+27 moreCONFLUENCE MINISTRIES: $20,000 · Human ServicesCONFLUENCE MINI…Christian Alliance for Orphans: $10,000 · Human ServicesChristian Allia…AsOne Ministries: $10,000 · Human ServicesAsOne Ministrie…Living Water International: $5,000 · Human ServicesLiving Water In…INVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 · ReligionExchanged Life Ministries: $5,000 · ReligionJOHN JAY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH SOCIETY AND LAW INC: $1,500 · ReligionMarked Men for Christ Inc: $1,000 · ReligionColorado Christian University: $15,000 · EducationDenver Area Youth For Christ Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentURBAN YOUTH MINISTRIES: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $10,000 · HealthCONVOY OF HOPE: $5,000 · International
Other$227,500Human Services$45,000Religion$25,000Education$15,000Youth Development$12,500Health$10,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUMMIT MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONFLUENCE MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetColorado Christian University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Alliance for Orphans: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DENVER STREET SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEMBRACE MERCY: $10,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetINVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAsOne Ministries: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE OFFICE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetExchanged Life Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLiving Water International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH FOR LIFE ACTION: $3,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDowning Street Foundation DBA Downing House Attn Jerri Carr: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN JAY INSTITUTE FOR FAITH SOCIETY AND LAW INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DENVER BRASS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarked Men for Christ Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO BALLET: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Leadership Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Eugene C and Flor…Tyl FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Christian Community F…The Signatry Charitab…Servant FoundationLeadership Funding Fo…The Anschutz Foundati…Natl Christian Charit…The Denver FoundationThe Armstrong Family …Berglund Family Found…
The Eugene C and Florence Armstrong Family Foundation IncCO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Eugene C and Florence Armstrong Family Foundation Inc · Tyl Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · Leadership Funding Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Denver Foundation · The Armstrong Family Foundation · Berglund Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization G & G Outreach Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from G & G Outreach Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on G & G Outreach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home