Skip to content
Funders Together to End Homelessnes at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Funders Together to End Homelessnes

To harness philanthropy's expanding potential for impact and change to help end homelessness in america.

$532k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Employment$470kYouth Development$280kHuman Services$261kCommunity Improvement$140kHousing & Shelter$112kEducation$70kHealth$67kCivil Rights$67kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$70,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRUE COLORS UNITED$112,000
SAAD KIDILYE$70,000
CHANGE LABS$70,000
MIGIZI COMMUNICATIONS INC$70,000
LITTLE BIG HORN COLLEGE$70,000
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIAN DEVELOPM$70,000
PURPLE MAIA$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $261k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $65k → 16%LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING: $65k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION: $61k → 14%SAAD KIDILYE: $70k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
AZ
NM
TN
HI
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
3
American Youthworks

American youthworks (ayw) annually provides 400+ young adults with training and resources to build careers and strengthen their communities through education, paid career training, and national service. ayw programs prepare participants…

—
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
6
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
7
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
8
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission

Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…

Human Services
9
Institute for Native Pacific Education and Culture

To improve the quality of life for native hawaiians through community partnerships that provide educational opportunities and promote self-sufficiency.

Education
10
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
11
The Management Center

We help leaders working for social change build and run more equitable, sustainable, and results-driven organizations.

Education
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hired; the most unlike its peers is Land Together Dba Insight Garden Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS INC: $75,000 · OtherNEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING AND EMP…LITTLE BIG HORN COLLEGE: $70,000 · OtherLITTLE BIG HORN COLLEGEPURPLE MAIA FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherPURPLE MAIA FOUNDATIONNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $70,000 · OtherNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIAN DEVELOPMENT C…YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $65,000 · OtherYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITEDMIGIZI Communications Inc: $70,000 · OtherMIGIZI Communications IncROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $67,000 · OtherROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM: $65,000 · OtherLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAMFair Work Center: $68,000 · EmploymentFair Work CenterCALIFORNIA INDIAN MANPOWER CONSORTIUM INC: $67,000 · EmploymentCALIFORNIA INDIAN M…HACK DIVERSITY INC: $65,000 · EmploymentHACK DIVERSITY INCHIRED: $65,000 · EmploymentHIREDSaad K'idilye': $70,000 · Human ServicesSaad K'idilye'LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $65,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZA DE ENCUENT…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $65,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRIST…Chicago Commons Association: $61,000 · Human ServicesChicago Commons Ass…TRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $112,000 · Civil RightsTRUE COLORS U…GIDEONS ARMY GRASSROOTS ARMY FOR CHILDREN: $67,000 · Civil RightsGIDEONS ARMY …RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentRECONCILE…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTNERSHIP CRADLE TO CAREER: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOU…ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterCHANGE LABS: $70,000 · Community Improvement
Other$552,000Employment$265,000Human Services$261,000Civil Rights$179,000Youth Development$130,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Community Improvement$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC: $112,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNEW YORK ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS: $75,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHANGE LABS: $70,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMIGIZI Communications Inc: $70,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPURPLE MAIA FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSaad K'idilye': $70,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDIAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $70,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFair Work Center: $68,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA INDIAN MANPOWER CONSORTIUM INC: $67,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $67,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIDEONS ARMY GRASSROOTS ARMY FOR CHILDREN: $67,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHACK DIVERSITY INC: $65,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $65,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED: $65,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM: $65,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE: $65,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $65,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTNERSHIP CRADLE TO CAREER: $65,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetHIRED: $65,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChicago Commons Association: $61,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Develop…Silicon Valley Commun…Sierra Health Foundat…WK Kellogg FoundationLocal Initiatives Sup…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
First Nations Development InstituteCO15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · WK Kellogg Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Funders Together to End Homelessnes funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Funders Together to End Homelessnes. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Funders Together to End Homelessnes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home