Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fuller Center Disaster ReBuilders Inc

The mission of Fuller Center Disaster ReBuilders(FCDR), faith-driven and Christ-centered, is to rebuild the underinsured homes of low-income families who have experienced storm damage in major disaster areas using volunteer labor and donated funds.

$1.3M
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$324k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182022.

Housing & Shelter$468kHuman Services$416kPublic Safety & Disaster$408kReligion$90kPhilanthropy$65kCommunity Improvement$23k
02FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $794k
  • $250k+1 grant · $324k
$23,435
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bethel's Place$324,097
Hope Disaster Recovery$222,088
Habitat for Humanity Laredo$189,923
Habitat for Humanity Pasadena$171,800
Mosaic in Action$92,230
Blanco River Regional Recovery Team$59,817
Victoria County Long Term Recovery Group$57,655
Settegast Heights Redevelopment Corporation$36,000
Waco Community Development$23,435
Habitat for Humanity of Jefferson County$22,500
The Fuller Center for Housing$20,241
Coastal Bend Disaster Recovery Group$20,000
The Call To Build$15,000
National Association of Christian Churches$12,685
Galilee Community Development Corporation$11,071
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $416k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Mosaic in Action: $92k → 10%Bethel's Place: $324k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love in action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

2
Habitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc

Habitat for Humanity of Texarkana is devoted to making the dream of home-ownership true for low income families. We believe in a hand up, not a hand out, so partner families provide sweat equity into the building of their homes and join a…

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
4
Rio Grande Habitat for Humanityinc

Provide homes for low income families

5
Affordable Homes of South Texas Inc

Affordable Homes of South Texas, Inc. is organized for the purpose of providing housing for qualified low-income families within the City of McAllen, Texas and Hidalgo County, Texas.

Housing & Shelter
6
Bay Area Habitat for Humanity - Houston Inc

Bahfh is an affiliate of habitat for humanity intl, an ecumenical christian non-profit which is committed to eliminating substandard housing & homelessness worldwide. since 1991, bahfh has been building safe, affordable homes in galveston,…

7
Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

8
Habitat for Humanity Polk Co Tx Inc

To provide affordable housing for the poor.

9
Arkansas Valley Habitat for Humanity

To build simple, decent, and affordable homes in partnership with god's people in need by sharing the process of eliminating poverty housing, nurturing families, and witnessing to our faith in god.

Housing & Shelter
10
Jefferson County Long Term Recovery Group Inc

To assist residents with long-term recovery,specifically, low-income individuals and families who were affected by and have unmet needs caused from any man-made or natural disaster, in Jefferson County, Texas.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Habitat for Humanity Tuscaloosa

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

12
Habitat for Humanity of Puerto Rico Inc

A non for profit organization that works in partnership with donors, volunteers, and homeowners of all backgrounds to build, remodel, and rehabilitate decent and affordable housing for those in need.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Fuller Center for Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Settagast Heights Redevelopment Corporation Northeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LAREDO INC — $189,923 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LAREDO INCPASADENA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $171,800 · OtherPASADENA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCCLEAR LAKE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $90,000 · OtherCLEAR LAKE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSettagast Heights Redevelopment Corporation Northeast — $36,000 · OtherSettagast Heights Redevelopment Corporati…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $22,500 · Other+3 more — $30,516 · Other+3 moreBETHELS PLACE — $324,097 · Human ServicesBETHELS PLACEMOSAIC IN ACTION — $92,230 · Human ServicesMOSAIC IN ACTIONCY-HOPE INC — $222,088 · EducationCY-HOPE INCBLANCO RIVER REGIONAL RECOVERY TEAM — $59,817 · Public Safety & DisasterBLANCO RIV…VICTORIA COUNTY LONG-TERM RECOVERY GROUP — $57,655 · Public Safety & DisasterVICTORIA C…COASTAL BEND DISASTER RECOVERY GROUP — $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCOASTAL BE…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $65,000 · Community ImprovementWACO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DBA GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $23,435 · Community ImprovementTHE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC — $30,241 · Housing & ShelterTHE CALL TO BUILD INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $11,071 · Housing & ShelterGUADALUPE ECONOMIC SERVICES CORPORATION — $9,654 · Housing & Shelter
Other$540,739Human Services$416,327Education$222,088Public Safety & Disaster$137,472Community Improvement$88,435Housing & Shelter$65,966

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETHELS PLACE — $324,097 over 1y, 25% of budgetCY-HOPE INC — $222,088 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LAREDO INC — $189,923 over 1y, 11% of budgetPASADENA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $171,800 over 1y, 35% of budgetMOSAIC IN ACTION — $92,230 over 1y, 61% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCO RIVER REGIONAL RECOVERY TEAM — $59,817 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetVICTORIA COUNTY LONG-TERM RECOVERY GROUP — $57,655 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetTHE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC — $30,241 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWACO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DBA GRASSROOTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $23,435 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY — $22,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOASTAL BEND DISASTER RECOVERY GROUP — $20,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE CALL TO BUILD INC — $15,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $11,071 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUADALUPE ECONOMIC SERVICES CORPORATION — $9,654 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC FORT BEND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,831 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas State Affordable Housing CorporationTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation · The St Bernard Project Inc · Good360 · Samaritan's Purse · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fuller Center Disaster ReBuilders Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fuller Center Disaster ReBuilders Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fuller Center Disaster ReBuilders Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $12k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph