Skip to content
Friends of St Lawrence-Watts Youth Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Friends of St Lawrence-Watts Youth Center

Friends of St.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.1M
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $60,460, the rows itemized in this filing. The $76,080 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,620 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$578k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Lawrence of Brindisi School$25,960
St Pius X St Matthias Academy$17,000
St Mary s Academy$7,000
Bishop Montgomery High School$5,500
Bishop Conaty Our Lady of Loretto High School$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%St Mary s Academy: $7k → 14%ST MARY'S ACADEMY: $6k → 14%ST MARY'S ACADEMY: $4k → 14%ST MARY'S ACADEMY: $4k → 14%ST JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%ST LAWRENCE BRINDSI SCHOOL: $192k → 14%ST LAWRENCE BRINDSI SCHOOL: $177k → 14%ST LAWRENCE BRINDSI SCHOOL: $174k → 14%ST LAWRENCE BRINDSI SCHOOL: $169k → 14%St Lawrence Brindisi School: $33k → 14%St Lawrence of Brindisi School: $26k → 14%St Lawrence of Brindisi School: $23k → 14%ST LAWRENCE BRINDISI SCHOOL: $8k → 14%BISHOP MONTGOMERY: $9k → 14%Bishop Montgomery High School: $8k → 14%Verbum Dei High School: $7k → 14%BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 14%VERBUM DEI HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 14%Bishop Montgomery High School: $7k → 14%CATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%VERBUM DEI HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%Bishop Montgomery High School: $6k → 14%CATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%VERBUM DEI HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%BISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%MARY STAR OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%RAMONA CONVENT SECONDARY SCHOOL: $2k → 14%BISHOP CONATY: $22k → 14%BISHOP CONATY: $20k → 14%BISHOP CONATY: $19k → 14%BISHOP CONATY: $13k → 14%BISHOP CONATY: $12k → 14%Bishop Conaty Our Lady of Loretto High School: $11k → 14%Bishop Conaty High School: $10k → 14%Bishop Conaty Our Lady of Loretto High School: $5k → 14%LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 14%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%NOTRE DAME ACADEMY: $4k → 14%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%NOTRE DAME ACADEMY: $3k → 14%ST PIUS XST MARTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $18k → 14%St Pius X St Matthias Academy: $17k → 14%ST PIUS XST MATTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $17k → 14%ST PIUS XST MATTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 14%ST PIUS XST MATTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 14%St Pius X St Mathias High School: $11k → 14%ST PIUS XST MATTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$17k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LAWRENCE BRINDISI SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $711k
  • SL
    ST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI
    4× · 2022–2025 · $89k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2017–2021 · $73k

Funded once

  • VD
    VERBUM DEI JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MO
    MARY OF THE SEA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LAWRENCE BRINDISI SCHOOL: $711,243 · OtherST LAWRENCE BRINDISI SCHOOLST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI: $89,317 · OtherST LAWRENCE OF BRINDISIIndividual grant recipient: $72,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PIUS XST MATTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $51,750 · OtherST MATTHIAS HIGH SCHOOL: $46,100 · OtherBISHOP MONTGOMERY HIGH SCHOOL: $40,500 · OtherBISHOP CONATY OUR LADY OF LORETTO HIGH SCHOOL: $38,500 · Other+12 more: $85,856 · Other+12 more
Other$1,135,816

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ahmanson Foundati…Carrie Estelle Doheny…Mayr George H - MainCatholic Community Fo…Farmers & Merchants B…California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…The Blackbaud Giving …Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ahmanson FoundationCA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ahmanson Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Mayr George H - Main · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Friends of St Lawrence-Watts Youth Center?

Find your warmest path to Friends of St Lawrence-Watts Youth Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Friends of St Lawrence-Watts Youth Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home