Skip to content

· Private foundation

Friedery Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$521kInternational$259kYouth Development$208kHuman Services$149kRecreation & Sports$90kPhilanthropy$55kEmployment$41kCrime & Legal$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $148k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF WILLIAM MARY$50,000
AGROS INTERNATIONAL$40,000
CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY$25,000
TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN$15,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$15,000
SUMMIT FOUNDATION$12,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MISSION ST LOUIS$10,000
MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION$10,000
IMPACT ON EDUCATION$10,000
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER: $5k → 11%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $6k → 8%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
SC
HI
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Friedery Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Friedery Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 13 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+29%

Still filing today

69%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AGROS INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +259%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $136k · revenue +59%
  • CA
    CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP
    8× · 2018–2025 · $115k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AC
    ASCENT COMMUNITY CHURCH-LONGMONT CO
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CC
    CALIFORNIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE LAHAINA RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
7
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
8
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
9
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agros International; the most unlike its peers is Seaworld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $400,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARYTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $95,000 · OtherTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDRENGREATER BOULDER YOUNG LIFE: $62,500 · OtherGREATER BOULDER YOUNG LIFECOLLEGE OF WILLIAM MARY: $50,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM MARYYOUNG LIFE - ST LOUIS: $30,000 · Other+14 more: $124,100 · Other+14 moreAGROS INTERNATIONAL: $285,000 · InternationalAGROS INTERNATIONAL+2 more: $14,000 · InternationalCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP: $115,000 · Crime & LegalCHICAGO A…I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Crime & LegalI HAVE A …YOUNG LIFE: $135,790 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIF…THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $57,976 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $51,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyWilliam & Mary Foundation: $100,000 · EducationEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $45,000 · Civil Rights
Other$761,600International$299,000Crime & Legal$139,000Youth Development$135,790Philanthropy$118,976Education$100,000Civil Rights$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGROS INTERNATIONAL: $285,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $135,790 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP: $115,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetWilliam & Mary Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $57,976 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION ST LOUIS: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT ON EDUCATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEAWORLD & BUSCH GARDENS CONSERVATION FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGROS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP ↗
  • Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT ON EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEAWORLD & BUSCH GARDENS CONSERVATION FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friedery Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friedery Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friedery Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Friedery Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friedery Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph