Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Friedery Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$521kInternational$259kYouth Development$208kHuman Services$149kRecreation & Sports$90kPhilanthropy$55kEmployment$41kCrime & Legal$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY$50,000
AGROS INTERNATIONAL$40,000
CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY$25,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$15,000
SUMMIT FOUNDATION$12,500
TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN$10,000
MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION$10,000
WATER MISSION$8,000
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$3,000
MISSION ST LOUIS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER: $5k → 11%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $6k → 8%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TREE INC: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
SC
HI
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Friedery Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Friedery Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 12 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$1.3M
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+49%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AGROS INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +259%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $136k · revenue +59%
  • WM
    William & Mary Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • AC
    ASCENT COMMUNITY CHURCH-LONGMONT CO
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • CC
    CALIFORNIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE LAHAINA RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
7
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
8
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
9
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

12
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Water Missions International and the most unlike its peers is Seaworld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY — $400,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARYTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $80,000 · OtherTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDRENGREATER BOULDER YOUNG LIFE — $62,500 · OtherGREATER BOULDER YOUNG LIFEYOUNG LIFE - ST LOUIS — $30,000 · OtherASCENT COMMUNITY CHURCH-LONGMONT CO — $25,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $30,000 · Other+8 more — $38,100 · Other+8 moreAGROS INTERNATIONAL — $245,000 · InternationalAGROS INTERNATIONAL+2 more — $14,000 · International+2 moreYOUNG LIFE — $135,790 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFECHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP — $90,000 · Crime & LegalI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION — $21,000 · Crime & LegalWilliam & Mary Foundation — $100,000 · EducationTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION — $45,476 · PhilanthropyMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $41,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyFAMILY TREE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesWEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$665,600International$259,000Youth Development$135,790Crime & Legal$111,000Education$100,000Philanthropy$96,476Human Services$31,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAGROS INTERNATIONAL — $245,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $135,790 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam & Mary Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP — $90,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION — $45,476 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $41,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION ST LOUIS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEAWORLD & BUSCH GARDENS CONSERVATION FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGROS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds William & Mary Foundation
  • Who funds CHICAGO ADVENTURE THERAPY NFP
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FAMILY TREE INC
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds WEBSTER CHILD CARE CENTER
  • Who funds MISSION ST LOUIS
  • Who funds SEAWORLD & BUSCH GARDENS CONSERVATION FUND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Friedery Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friedery Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Friedery Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph