Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freund Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$27kRecreation & Sports$21kYouth Development$21kEducation$20kHealth$18kReligion$13kInternational$9kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,444
Median grant
6
States reached
$954k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLAP INC$11,195
IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE$5,597
PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$5,597
YOSEMITE-WAWONA EDUCATIONAL FUND$3,732
NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION$3,732
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,732
LIVE ACTION$1,444
FISH CAMP VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION$1,444
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER$1,444
FEMINISTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA$1,444
CHABAD OF THE BAY AREA$1,444
HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
SISTERS OF THE HOLY MISSION$744
40 DAYS FOR LIFE$744
A&A ALEXANDRIA$744
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TURNING POINT USA INC: $744 → 11%LIVE ACTION: $2k → 8%IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $6k → 10%PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $6k → 14%FISH CAMP FIRE RESCUE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 15%TUNNEL TO TOWER FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $2k → 22%GUATEMALA SERVICE PROJECTS INC: $3k → 5%BAYBEACH WILDLIFE SANTUARY: $6k → 10%BLACK GIRL MAGIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES: $11k → 10%FAMILY LEARNING AQUATIC PROGRAMS INC: $11k → 11%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%SAVE THE STORKS: $615 → 9%FEMINISTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA: $1k → 6%A&A ALEXANDRIA: $744 → 9%LIVE ACTION: $1k → 8%FISH CAMP FIRE RESCUE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 15%TUNNEL TO TOWER FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $827 → 22%FLAP INC: $11k → 10%BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES: $11k → 10%FAMILY LEARNING AQUATIC PROGRAMS INC: $11k → 11%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $4k → 17%SAVE THE STORKS: $615 → 9%LIVE ACTION: $1k → 8%FISH CAMP VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%TUNNEL TO TOWER FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $825 → 22%CHABAD OF THE BAY AREA: $2k → 10%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%FISH CAMP FIRE RESCUE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 15%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $744 → 22%A&A ALEXANDRIA: $2k → 10%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%YOSEMITE-WAWONA EDUCATIONAL FUND: $4k → 15%CHABAD OF THE BAY AREA: $1k → 10%YOSEMITE-WAWONA EDUCATIONAL: $3k → 15%CHABAD OF THE BAY AREA: $1k → 10%YOSEMITE-WAWONA EDUCATIONAL: $3k → 15%HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 10%ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH: $826 → 10%A&A ALEXANDRIA: $725 → 10%A&A ALEXANDRIA: $725 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 16 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
18

Total granted

$114k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
0%

Still filing today

44%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FAMILY LEARNING AQUATIC PROGRAMS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · 99% of their budget
  • NP
    NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $16k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • BG
    BLACK GIRL MAGIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +28%
  • BY
    BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • NZ
    N.E.W. ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC.
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence

We're freeing america from gun violence.continued on schedule oin a country where firearms outnumber people, our country's gun violence epidemic requires a multi-pronged approach - and that's what brady, the leading gun violence prevention…

Crime & Legal
4
Womens Life Care Center

The Women's Life Care Center exists to promote the sanctity of human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.

Health
5
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
6
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
7
Women's Rights Without Frontiers International

Women's rights without frontiers, international ("wrwf- or "the organization") is a nonprofit entity supporting the rights of women and girls, first in china, then in other countries' communities. the organization was founded by regina…

International
8
Fresh Lifelines for Youth Inc

Fly's mission is to partner with youth to unlock their potential, disrupt the pipeline to prison, and advance justice in california and beyond. fly envisions a country where all kids grow up valued and supported, and the pipeline to prison…

Youth Development
9
Zero to Three National Center for Infants Toddlers and Families

At zero to three we provide parents, professionals, and policymakers the knowledge and know-how to nurture early development. we envision a society that has the knowledge and will to support all infants and toddlers in reaching their full…

Human Services
10
Fresh Start Women's Foundation

The mission of fresh start women's foundation is to provide access and resources that help women achieve self-sufficiency and use their strength to thrive. we do this work in pursuit of our vision to create unlimited opportunities for…

Human Services
11
Project Milk Mission

Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…

Food & Nutrition
12
Healthy Start Coalition of Hardee Highlands and Polk Counties Inc

To promote and support healthy pregnancies, babies, and families, by providing a maternal and child health system of care through community partnerships in hardee, highlands, and polk counties.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Storks; the most unlike its peers is Family Learning Aquatic Programs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
5/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATION: $15,780 · OtherNATIONAL POLICE ASSOCIATIONFLAP INC: $11,195 · OtherFLAP INCFISH CAMP FIRE RESCUE ASSOCIATION: $9,416 · OtherFISH CAMP FIRE RESCUE ASSOCIATIONN.E.W. ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC.: $8,803 · OtherN.E.W. ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC.CHABAD OF THE BAY AREA: $7,026 · OtherCHABAD OF THE BAY AREAIndividual grant recipient: $6,117 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherLIVE ACTION: $4,683 · OtherFEMINISTS FOR LIFE OF: $4,485 · OtherSISTERS OF THE HOLY MISSION: $4,173 · OtherPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $5,597 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $4,470 · Other+20 more: $33,537 · Other+20 moreFAMILY LEARNING AQUATIC PROGRAMS INC: $21,226 · Recreation & SportsFAMILY LEAR…BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,563 · Crime & LegalIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $5,597 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,846 · HealthSave the Storks: $1,230 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,114 · Education40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $4,173 · EducationBLACK GIRL MAGIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN: $10,663 · Youth DevelopmentArts Business Collaborative: $8,756 · Community ImprovementHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$121,282Recreation & Sports$21,226Crime & Legal$16,160Health$14,076Education$13,287Youth Development$10,663Community Improvement$9,756

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY LEARNING AQUATIC PROGRAMS INC: $21,226 over 2y, 99% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,846 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK GIRL MAGIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN: $10,663 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,563 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,114 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArts Business Collaborative: $8,756 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $5,597 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $4,470 over 3y, 0.1% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $4,173 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHOOSE LIFE INC: $3,432 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGUATEMALA SERVICE PROJECTS INC: $2,756 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFEMINISTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA INC: $1,444 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSave the Storks: $1,230 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $744 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY LEARNING AQUATIC PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRL MAGIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES IN ↗
  • Who funds BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Arts Business Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CHOOSE LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds GUATEMALA SERVICE PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEMINISTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH CAMP VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Save the Storks ↗
  • Who funds HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freund Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freund Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Freund Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph