Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freeman & Gladys Wilson Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$311kHealth$139kHuman Services$43kInternational$42kEducation$30kYouth Development$28kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH$43,000
THE MISSION INC$10,000
LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
TEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA$2,000
WOUNDED HEROES OF AMERICA$1,500
CITY OF HOPE$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TX HILL COUNTRY$1,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$1,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$1,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH: $4k → 10%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $3k → 17%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3k → 21%MISSION DISPATCH: $15k → 9%FISHER HOUSE: $3k → 8%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3k → 21%CONVOY OF HOPE: $3k → 15%CONVOY OF HOPE: $3k → 15%TEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA: $4k → 11%TEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA: $4k → 11%THE MISSION INC: $15k → 11%TEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA: $4k → 11%THE MISSION INC: $13k → 11%TEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA: $4k → 11%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $47k → 14%THE MISSION INC: $10k → 11%TEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA: $4k → 11%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $43k → 14%RANCHO DE SUS NINOS: $6k → 11%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $37k → 14%RANCHO DE SUS NINOS: $6k → 11%RIVER OF GOD INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $24k → 14%THE MISSION INC: $4k → 11%RIVER OF GOD INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $10k → 14%THE MISSION INC: $4k → 11%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 14%THE MISSION INC: $4k → 11%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 14%THE MISSION INC: $4k → 11%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 14%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 14%RIVER OF GOD INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 14%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $3k → 14%CHRISTIAN LIFE CHURCH: $7k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%TEEN CHALLENGE MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
OR
CA
MO
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$579k · 30 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +64% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
5

Total granted

$579k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+64%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionInternationalEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +134%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +312%
  • RD
    Rancho De Sus Ninos Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • MD
    MISSION DISPATCHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +64%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
3
Troops First Foundation Incorporated

To develop, operate, and support a synergistic group of wellness, quality of life, and event-based initiatives in support of today's combat-wounded military personnel and their families, while facilitating a greater recognition and…

Public Benefit
4
Texas Wounded Warriors

The mission of the texas wounded warrior foundation is to raise awareness, to honor, and to empower our wounded united state military warriors, enabling them to assimilate back to daily life upon their return from combat. we seek to…

Public Benefit
5
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
6
It's About the Warriors Foundation

To assist and empower all post 9/11 veterans and their families from the tri-state area, regardless if they have been wounded or have been deployed, with our various programs thus, leading them to a successful and enriched life.

Public Benefit
7
Warrior Reunion Foundation

Supports combat veterans in overcoming the challenges of post-military transition by reconnecting those who served together overseas through the execution of recovery reunions.

Public Benefit
8
Troops Direct

Troops Direct augments the United States military supply chain by providing American forces with critically needed items that cannot be accessed through conventional government channels.

Philanthropy
9
Special Operations Warrior Foundation

To ensure comprehensive educational support including, but not limited to, academic advocacy, preschool and private school grants, tutoring, support for students with disabilities, college readiness programs, full financial assistance for…

Education
10
Warrior Health Foundation Inc

The mission of warrior health foundation is to mitigate the effects of "operator syndrome" in post 9/11 veteran operators of the special forces community through the provision of high-quality free or low-cost proactive and preventative…

Health
11
Uso Foundation

The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.

—
12
The Warrior's Journey

The military creates a set of unique challenges that most people don't recognize. these invisible wounds often lead to isolation, addiction, and suicide. the warrior's journey is dedicated to raising awareness and creating preventative…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $159,500 · OtherNEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCHTHE MISSION: $54,000 · OtherTHE MISSIONLONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $51,500 · OtherLONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONRIVER OF GOD INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $42,000 · OtherRIVER OF GOD INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIESST JUDE CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH: $25,500 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGE - S CALIFORNIA: $24,500 · Other+19 more: $142,600 · Other+19 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,000 · ReligionMISSION DISPATCH: $15,000 · ReligionCONVOY OF HOPE: $12,500 · InternationalRancho De Sus Ninos Inc: $12,000 · InternationalTROOPATHON: $3,000 · InternationalPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $8,000 · HealthMICHELLES PLACE CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthWOUNDED HEROES OF AMERICA A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $13,000 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesWest Torrance Little League: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$499,600Religion$33,000International$27,500Education$20,000Health$17,000Philanthropy$13,000Human Services$8,000Recreation & Sports$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED HEROES OF AMERICA A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $13,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRancho De Sus Ninos Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMICHELLES PLACE CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWest Torrance Little League: $3,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTROOPATHON: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MISSION DISPATCH ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED HEROES OF AMERICA A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Rancho De Sus Ninos Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MICHELLES PLACE CANCER RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds West Torrance Little League ↗
  • Who funds TROOPATHON ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Renaissance Charitable Foundation IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freeman & Gladys Wilson Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freeman & Gladys Wilson Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Freeman & Gladys Wilson Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Freeman & Gladys Wilson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freeman & Gladys Wilson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph