· Private foundation
Frederick Henry & Diana Prince Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of FREDERICK HENRY & DIANA PRINCE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $3,000 |
| NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM | $2,500 |
| WILDAID | $2,500 |
| L'HOSPITAL ALBERT SCHWITZER HAITI | $2,500 |
| NATIONAL SPORTING LIBARARY & MUSEUM | $2,500 |
| NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| PRESERVATION SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| VA POINT TO POINT FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA | $1,000 |
| CITY WILDLIFE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL | $1,000 |
| TWO EAST 62ND STREET FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +223%
- WIWILDAID INC8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +5%
- NGNational Gallery of Art3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue +103%
Funded once
- 1M12 METRE YACHT CLUB NEWPORT STATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +86%
- GBGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +89%
- CMCHAMBER MUSIC SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.
Saves open space, cares for nature, and connects people to the outdoors. (See schedule O)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Club of America and the most unlike its peers is 12 Metre Yacht Club Newport Station Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NATIONAL SPORTING LIBRARY AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
- Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
- Who funds MIDDLEBURG HUMANE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ELMWOOD CEMETERY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MIDDLEBURG COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds City Wildlife Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ROBERT POTTER LEAGUE FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON CONCERT OPERA ↗
- Who funds Cheetah Conservation Fund ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE PIEDMONT UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds 12 METRE YACHT CLUB NEWPORT STATION INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Frederick Henry Prince Testamentary Trust · The Maurice B Tobin Family Foundation · Dun Foundation · Lyn & Margaret Comfort Charitable Foundation · The Principato Family Foundation Inc · The Anne and David B Ford Jr Foundation · The Lee and Juliet Folger Fund · Ejmp Fund for Philanthropy · Awa Family Foundation · Alletta Morris McBean Charitable Trust · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frederick Henry & Diana Prince Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.