· Private foundation
Fred I & Gilda Nobel Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $519k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHARED HUMANITY USA | $48,100 |
| MAKE THE ROAD NY | $45,000 |
| SAVE THE SOUND | $40,000 |
| OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND | $35,000 |
| CENT AMERICAN RESOURCE CTR -CARECEN | $35,000 |
| BRONX RIVER ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK | $35,000 |
| CALLE FILMS INC | $35,000 |
| THE SENTENCING PROJECT | $30,000 |
| NORTH STAR FUND INC | $30,000 |
| RIVER VALLEY ORGANIZING | $25,000 |
| NYPIRG | $25,000 |
| LONG ISLAND SOUND STEWARDSHIP FUND | $20,000 |
| CAST | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING | $16,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $337k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MTMake the Road New York9× · 2017–2025 · $298k · revenue +35%
- TITHE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $211k · revenue +79%
- BRBRONX RIVER ALLIANCE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $210k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $25k
- FFAIRVOTEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +54%
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INCone grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is River Valley Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
- Who funds Shared Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BRONX RIVER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Center for Common Ground ↗
- Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds OLA OF EASTERN LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER VALLEY ORGANIZING ↗
- Who funds BORDER ANGELS ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds Hilltop Alliance ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds SUNRISE MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds ERASE RACISM INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Nassau County Inc ↗
- Who funds SEXUALITY INFORMATION AND EDUCATION COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Jeanine Heller Foundation Inc · The Rauch Foundation Inc · New York Community Bank Foundation · Hispanic Federation Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred I & Gilda Nobel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Education & Training Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fred I & Gilda Nobel Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fred I & Gilda Nobel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.