Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Our researchers are pushing the limits of human knowledge, from foundational biology to population-level health.

$169M
Granted FY2022
299
Grants FY2022
40
States reached
$20M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$503MEducation$17MScience & Tech$13MInternational$755kCommunity Improvement$328k
02FY2022 · 299 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 299 grants below total $122,053,301 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $168,939,840 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,886,539 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k27 grants · $190k
  • $10k–50k111 grants · $3.0M
  • $50k–250k92 grants · $11M
  • $250k+69 grants · $108M
$57,544
Median grant
40
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$20,142,359
ORLANDO IMMUNOLOGY CENTER PA$5,279,684
CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS$4,699,154
DUKE UNIVERSITY$4,658,374
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC$4,121,872
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA$3,746,490
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER$3,347,876
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$3,074,789
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$2,979,260
MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC$2,681,511
NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC$2,620,597
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$2,564,380
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$2,070,721
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$2,045,819
UNITED STATES TREASURY$2,044,244
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC: $2.3M → 16%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3.8M → 22%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1.5M → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1.3M → 14%NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC: $2.6M → 17%UNIV OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER: $1.8M → 16%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $1.2M → 14%ORLANDO IMMUNOLOGY CENTER PA: $6.2M → 13%TAMPA VA RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $1.0M → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $2.0M → 15%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $1.2M → 21%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER: $3.8M → 16%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $1.5M → 11%MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC: $2.7M → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $3.0M → 14%MISSOURI BREAKS INDUSTRIES RESEARCH INC: $1.2M → 25%UNITED STATES TREASURY: $2.0M → 8%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3.1M → 19%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC: $1.8M → 16%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1.2M → 12%NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC: $2.1M → 17%ORLANDO IMMUNOLOGY CENTER PA: $5.3M → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $1.7M → 15%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER: $3.3M → 16%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.4M → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $3.0M → 19%NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC: $1.9M → 17%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $1.5M → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.4M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1.7M → 14%NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC: $1.6M → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1.4M → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1.2M → 14%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $1.2M → 12%CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY: $2.0M → 10%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $1.1M → 12%FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH: $2.6M → 16%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $1.9M → 16%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER: $1.7M → 16%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN: $3.3M → 17%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $6.1M → 9%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $5.7M → 9%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $1.4M → 9%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $7.3M → 9%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $6.9M → 9%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $4.8M → 9%CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $4.7M → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $1.1M → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $45M on the FY2022 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$30M · 65% · 30 grants

Stated purpose: VACCINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE · PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCES · CLINICAL RESEARCH

South America$12M · 26% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: VACCINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

North America (Canada and Mexico)$2.8M · 6% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCES · HUMAN BIOLOGY · VACCINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.1M · 2% · 13 grants

Stated purpose: VACCINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE · HUMAN BIOLOGY · PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCES

East Asia and the Pacific$78k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCES

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$488M · 169 repeat orgs$9.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

169 repeat relationships — 133 still active in FY2022, 36 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

169
17

Total granted

$488M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+29%

Still filing today

53%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthEducationScience & TechInternationalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $33M · revenue +51%
  • EU
    Emory University
    6× · 2017–2022 · $16M · revenue +80%
  • NY
    NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $9.4M · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • AV
    ARIZONA VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $573k · revenue +76% · 31% of their budget
  • FF
    Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $438k · revenue -59%
  • WM
    WEST MONROE PARTNERS LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $328k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

11
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meharry Medical College and the most unlike its peers is Sierra Veterans Research and Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyMilitary Veterans SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/220
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,345

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 221 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
124/126
Grantees still filing
105/126
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $134,349,021 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $18,190,172 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDORLANDO IMMUNOLOGY CENTER PA — $11,461,918 · Other+95 more — $123,001,232 · Other+95 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $33,412,091 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYEmory University — $16,111,564 · EducationEmory UniversityTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $13,150,663 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $11,735,939 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $8,365,460 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $7,961,222 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERUniversity of Miami — $5,324,230 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,083,621 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $4,258,979 · Education+24 more — $21,177,548 · Education+24 moreCANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS — $36,981,089 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH AND BIOS…NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC — $9,413,648 · HealthNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER IN…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $9,236,719 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPI…Vanderbilt University Medical Center — $7,831,199 · HealthVanderbilt University Me…UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $7,245,332 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MED…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $6,847,564 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS ME…FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $5,363,949 · Health+53 more — $32,291,214 · Health+53 moreINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY — $964,691 · Science & TechSAGE BIONETWORKS — $296,761 · Science & TechSRI INTERNATIONAL — $116,086 · Science & Tech+1 more — $46,000 · Science & TechSouth Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation For Research & Education Inc — $1,288,599 · Public BenefitPATH — $987,951 · InternationalTHE POPULATION COUNCIL INC — $54,061 · InternationalNMDP FOUNDATION — $189,000 · PhilanthropyADA Forsyth Institute Inc — $99,267 · Philanthropy
Other$287,002,343Education$126,581,317Health$115,210,714Science & Tech$1,423,538Public Benefit$1,288,599International$1,042,012Philanthropy$288,267

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS — $36,981,089 over 6y, 63% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $33,412,091 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEmory University — $16,111,564 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $13,150,663 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $11,735,939 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC — $9,413,648 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $9,236,719 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $8,365,460 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $7,961,222 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $7,831,199 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $7,245,332 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $6,847,564 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $5,363,949 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $5,324,230 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,083,621 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $4,728,571 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $4,258,979 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $3,292,075 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $2,843,553 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $2,681,511 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $2,650,118 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA VA RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $1,896,866 over 2y, 30% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $1,874,351 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFrontier Science & Technology Research Foundation Inc — $1,789,287 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $1,486,411 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $1,477,975 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE HOSPITAL INC — $1,413,213 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN — $1,353,932 over 2y, 35% of budgetSouth Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation For Research & Education Inc — $1,288,599 over 2y, 26% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $1,285,683 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC — $1,281,775 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $1,231,935 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC — $1,158,325 over 2y, 44% of budgetChicago Association for Research and Education in Science — $1,077,066 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,070,625 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON — $1,067,227 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $1,045,587 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $1,027,515 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $1,017,929 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPATH — $987,951 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY — $964,691 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $951,334 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM — $882,469 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $868,199 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetUniversity of Georgia Research Foundation Inc — $857,742 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $850,493 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE — $798,790 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $788,853 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer CenterWA110.9× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Johns Hopkins University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · University of Pittsburgh · Yale University · Emory University · Trustees of Boston University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Mayo Clinic · Seattle Children's Hospital · American Heart Association Inc · Washington University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine100% of income from government
  • Ada Forsyth Institute Inc38% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc27% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc3% of income from government
  • Hjf Medical Research International Inc1% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 221 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph